{"id":622,"date":"2012-06-21T10:19:05","date_gmt":"2012-06-21T07:19:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=622"},"modified":"2012-06-21T10:24:09","modified_gmt":"2012-06-21T07:24:09","slug":"sanayicinin-dogalgaz-kabusu-geri-dondu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/sanayicinin-dogalgaz-kabusu-geri-dondu\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Sanayicinin Do\u011falgaz Kabusu Geri D\u00f6nd\u00fc"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

Bursa ve Eski\u015fehir illerindeki sanayi b\u00f6lgeleri ve serbest t\u00fcketiciler, 2004-2007 d\u00f6nemine ait do\u011falgaz fark bedeli faturas\u0131 kabusunu ikinci kez ya\u015f\u0131yor.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Enerji Piyasas\u0131 D\u00fczenleme Kurumu\u2019nun (EPDK), 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 ta\u015f\u0131ma bedeli kararlar\u0131, aradan ge\u00e7en 8 y\u0131l\u0131n ard\u0131ndan\"\" sanayiciye milyonlarca liral\u0131k y\u00fck oldu. Boru Hatlar\u0131 ile Petrol Ta\u015f\u0131ma Anonim \u015eirketi (BOTA\u015e), 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda Bursa ve Eski\u015fehir illerindeki organize sanayi b\u00f6lgelerinden 80 milyon liraya yak\u0131n fark bedeli talebinde bulunmu\u015f ve bu bedeller \u00f6denmi\u015fti. Konu yarg\u0131ya ta\u015f\u0131nd\u0131 ve s\u00fcre\u00e7 halen devam ediyor. Ekim 2004-Aral\u0131k 2006 d\u00f6nemine ait ilk fark bedeli \u015fokunun ard\u0131ndan, BOTA\u015e bu ay b\u00f6lgelere g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi yaz\u0131 ile 2007 Ocak-Eyl\u00fcl d\u00f6nemine ait ikinci bir fark bedeli faturas\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131.<\/div>\n
HANG\u0130 B\u00d6LGEYE NE KADAR FATURA \u00c7IKACAK…?<\/strong><\/div>\n
Buna g\u00f6re BOTA\u015e, Bursa ve Eski\u015fehir illerinde 22 milyon liraya yak\u0131n bir bedeli sanayiciden talep ediyor. Bursa Ticaret ve Sanayi Odas\u0131 Organize Sanayi B\u00f6lgesi 9 milyon, Demirta\u015f Organize Sanayi B\u00f6lgesi 6,2 milyon, Eski\u015fehir Organize Sanayi B\u00f6lgesi 6 milyon, G\u00fcrsu Organize Sanayi B\u00f6lgesi 822 bin ve Nil\u00fcfer Organize Sanayi B\u00f6lgesi 175 bin lira do\u011falgaz ta\u015f\u0131ma bedeli fark faturas\u0131 \u00f6demekle kar\u015f\u0131 kar\u015f\u0131ya\u2026
\n\u00a0<\/div>\n
\u20198 YIL \u00d6NCEK\u0130 HATANIN FATURASINI \u00d6DET\u0130YORLAR…\u2019<\/strong><\/div>\n
DOSAB ve BOSB\u0130R Enerji A\u015e Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ferudun Kahraman \u015fu a\u00e7\u0131klamay\u0131 yapt\u0131: \u201cHalen temyiz s\u00fcreci devam eden ta\u015f\u0131ma bedeli fark faturas\u0131 davas\u0131 sonu\u00e7lanmadan, BOTA\u015e, 5 Haziran 2012 tarihli yaz\u0131s\u0131 ile 2.d\u00f6nem (Ocak 2007 – Eyl\u00fcl 2007) ta\u015f\u0131ma bedeli fark\u0131 ad\u0131 alt\u0131nda yeni bedeller talep ediyor. OSB\u2019ler hen\u00fcz ilk dava sonu\u00e7lanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131ndan dolay\u0131 bu bedelleri b\u00f6lge sanayicilerinden tahsil edemedi. \u015eimdi ikinci bir fatura ile ma\u011fduriyet olu\u015ftu. Kald\u0131 ki, olu\u015fan bu durumda biz sanayicilerin hi\u00e7bir etkisi ve hatas\u0131 yoktur. Konu tamamen EPDK\u2019n\u0131n ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 kararlarla ilgilidir. Ama 8 y\u0131l \u00f6nceki yanl\u0131\u015f kararlar\u0131n faturas\u0131n\u0131 bug\u00fcn biz sanayiciler \u00f6d\u00fcyor. Bu yanl\u0131\u015ft\u0131r ve bu yanl\u0131\u015ftan d\u00f6n\u00fclmelidir. BOTA\u015e OSB\u2019lerden tek faturada alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 alacak. \u0130lk bedelleri \u00f6dedik. Ama OSB\u2019ler kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131na bunu nas\u0131l r\u00fccu edecekler? Aradan ge\u00e7en 8 y\u0131l\u0131n ard\u0131ndan kapanan, ta\u015f\u0131nan fabrikalar var. Bu fabrikalar o d\u00f6nemdeki maliyet hesaplar\u0131n\u0131 o zamanki faturalara g\u00f6re yapt\u0131. \u015eimdi hesaplar de\u011fi\u015fti demek do\u011fru de\u011fil. G\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi ge\u00e7mi\u015fin hatalar\u0131 bug\u00fcn kar\u015f\u0131m\u0131za bir sorun yuma\u011f\u0131 olarak \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yor. Bizler i\u015fimizi g\u00fcc\u00fcm\u00fcz\u00fc b\u0131rak\u0131p, bizim olmayan hatalardan dolay\u0131 hukuksal sorunlarla bo\u011fu\u015fuyoruz. Sanayici, as\u0131l i\u015fine konsantre olup daha \u00e7ok \u00fcretim, ihracat, istihdam d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnecekken enerjisini ba\u015fkalar\u0131n\u0131n bu t\u00fcr hatalar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczeltmeye harc\u0131yor. B\u00f6yle olmamal\u0131. Kamu kurumlar\u0131 sanayiciyi s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131ya sokan de\u011fil, \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc a\u00e7an kurumlard\u0131r. Organize Sanayi B\u00f6lgeleri, yeni faturalar nedeniyle bir\u00e7ok yat\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131n\u0131 belki ask\u0131ya almak veya iptal etmek zorunda kalacaklar. B\u00fct\u00e7elerinde olmayan bu bedelleri \u00f6deyerek, sanayicilerine daha iyi hizmet \u00fcretmeleri s\u00f6z konusu olmayacak.\u201d
\n\u00a0<\/div>\n
\u2019BU FATURALAR OSB\u2019LER\u0130N YATIRIMLARINI ENGELLEYECEK…\u2019<\/strong><\/div>\n
Bursa Ticaret ve Sanayi Odas\u0131 Y\u00f6netim Kurulu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ali U\u011fur da bug\u00fcnk\u00fc sonucu ortaya \u00e7\u0131kartan sebepte sanayicinin hi\u00e7bir etkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, \u201cKamu kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n hatas\u0131n\u0131 biz kapat\u0131yoruz. Ama bu bedeller sanayici i\u00e7in \u00e7ok a\u011f\u0131r sonu\u00e7lar do\u011furacakt\u0131r. OSB\u2019ler bu bedelleri kat\u0131l\u0131mc\u0131lar\u0131ndan almak zorunda. BOTA\u015e, amme alaca\u011f\u0131 olarak alaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 nispeten kolay tahsil etme imkan\u0131nda. Ancak b\u00f6lgeler geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck fark bedelini \u00f6demeyen veya b\u00f6lgeden ta\u015f\u0131nm\u0131\u015f, i\u015fyerini kapatm\u0131\u015f olan sanayiciden bunu al\u0131rken ayn\u0131 imkana sahip de\u011fil. Hukuki yola gitti\u011fimizde y\u0131llarca devam edecek bir s\u00fcre\u00e7ten bahsediyoruz. Bu bir yana, y\u0131llarca \u00f6ncesinin yanl\u0131\u015f hesab\u0131 i\u015fletmelere ciddi y\u00fckler getirecektir. Biz BTSO OSB olarak bu y\u0131l planlad\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015febekesinin yenilenmesi gibi baz\u0131 alt yap\u0131 yat\u0131r\u0131mlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131 yapamayaca\u011f\u0131z\u201d dedi.
\n\u00a0<\/div>\n
\u2019Y\u00dcR\u00dcTMEN\u0130N DURDURULMASI DAVASI A\u00c7ACA\u011eIZ…\u2019<\/strong><\/div>\n
Bu arada Eski\u015fehir Organize Sanayi B\u00f6lgesi M\u00fcd\u00fcr\u00fc ve OSB\u00dcK B\u00f6lge M\u00fcd\u00fcrleri Komisyonu Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Ali \u0130hsan Karamanl\u0131 da konuyla ilgili de\u011ferlendirmesinde, organize sanayi b\u00f6lgelerinin bu konuda sahipsiz b\u0131rak\u0131ld\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 savundu. Karamanl\u0131, \u201cY\u0131llar sonra ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan faturalar konusunda tek su\u00e7lu EPDK\u2019d\u0131r. Fakat onlara hi\u00e7bir yapt\u0131r\u0131m yok. Biz ayn\u0131 hatalar\u0131 yapsak yerimizde saniye kalamazd\u0131k. Esasen, BOTA\u015e\u2019a de\u011fil bizlerin EPDK\u2019ya dava a\u00e7mas\u0131 laz\u0131m ki, hatan\u0131n bedeli ortaya \u00e7\u0131ks\u0131n. Bu kez y\u00fcr\u00fctmenin durdurulmas\u0131 i\u00e7in hukuki yola girece\u011fiz\u201d \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu.
\n\u00a0<\/div>\n
SORUNUN KAYNA\u011eI…<\/strong><\/div>\n
Do\u011falgazda ta\u015f\u0131ma bedellerini Enerji Piyasas\u0131 D\u00fczenleme Kurumu (EPDK) belirliyor. EPDK, 2004 y\u0131l\u0131nda 0,22 kuru\u015f olan bedeli 0,8 kuru\u015fa indiren bir karar ald\u0131. Bu karar\u0131 Bursagaz ve Esgaz yarg\u0131ya ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131. Yarg\u0131 EPDK\u2019y\u0131 haks\u0131z buldu yeni bir bedel belirlemesini istedi. EPDK da eski rakama geri d\u00f6nd\u00fc. Bunun \u00fczerine Bursagaz ve Esgaz, aradaki fark\u0131 BOTA\u015e\u2019tan ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 do\u011falgaz\u0131n bedelinden d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. BOTA\u015e, EPDK\u2019y\u0131 dava etti ve sonucunu beklemeden OSB\u2019lerden bu paray\u0131 tahsil yoluna gitti. Sanayici, kendi hatas\u0131 ve etkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 geli\u015fmeler kar\u015f\u0131s\u0131nda faturay\u0131 \u00f6deyen olmaktan dolay\u0131 isyan ediyor.
\n\u00a0<\/div>\n
2 YIL \u00d6NCE DE BENZER SIKINTI YA\u015eANDI…<\/strong><\/div>\n
30 Haziran 2009 tarihinde BOTA\u015e, Bursa ve Eski\u015fehir\u2019de serbest t\u00fcketici konumundaki kurulu\u015flara do\u011falgaz ta\u015f\u0131ma bedeli fark\u0131 faturas\u0131 g\u00f6nderdi. Yaz\u0131da fark bedelinin kamu alaca\u011f\u0131 niteli\u011finde oldu\u011fu ve \u00f6denmesi ihtaren bildirildi. OSB\u2019ler bu faturalar\u0131 geri g\u00f6nderip dava a\u00e7t\u0131. BOTA\u015e, aradan ge\u00e7en bir y\u0131l\u0131n ard\u0131ndan 2010 y\u0131l\u0131 Haziran ay\u0131nda, s\u00f6z konusu farklar\u0131 \u00f6demedikleri gerek\u00e7esiyle b\u00f6lgelerin banka hesaplar\u0131n\u0131 6183 Say\u0131l\u0131 Amme Alacaklar\u0131n\u0131n Tahsil Usul\u00fc Hakk\u0131nda Kanun h\u00fck\u00fcmlerine dayanarak bloke ettirdi. G\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fmeler sonras\u0131 BOTA\u015e 36 ay taksit imkan\u0131 getirdi. Ancak OSB\u2019ler bir s\u00fcre sonra paralar\u0131n tamam\u0131n\u0131 \u00f6deyip konuyu yarg\u0131ya ta\u015f\u0131d\u0131lar. Yarg\u0131 s\u00fcreci halen devam ediyor.
\n\u00a0<\/div>\n
2009\u2019DA 53 M\u0130LYON L\u0130RA \u00d6DENM\u0130\u015eT\u0130…<\/strong><\/div>\n
BOTA\u015e 2009 y\u0131l\u0131nda BTSO OSB\u2019ye 24,1 milyon, DOSAB\u2019dan 16,2 milyon, Eski\u015fehir OSB\u2019den 12 milyon, G\u00fcrsu OSB\u2019den 1,2 milyon lira ve NOSAB\u2019dan 295 bin lira fark bedeli faturas\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kartm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bu rakamlar ana para rakamlar\u0131. B\u00f6lgeler, bu ana para ve yasal faizleri BOTA\u015e\u2019a \u00f6demi\u015fti.<\/div>\n
\u00a0<\/div>\n
Kaynak: Olay<\/a><\/div>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.Bursa ve Eski\u015fehir illerindeki sanayi b\u00f6lgeleri ve serbest t\u00fcketiciler, 2004-2007 d\u00f6nemine ait do\u011falgaz fark bedeli faturas\u0131 kabusunu ikinci kez ya\u015f\u0131yor. Enerji Piyasas\u0131 D\u00fczenleme […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":624,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[46,53],"tags":[92,91,12],"views":735,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/622"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=622"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/622\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":626,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/622\/revisions\/626"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/624"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=622"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=622"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=622"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}