{"id":52842,"date":"2016-05-12T12:11:09","date_gmt":"2016-05-12T09:11:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=52842"},"modified":"2016-05-12T12:12:47","modified_gmt":"2016-05-12T09:12:47","slug":"kayip-kacakta-sirketleri-de-tuketiciyi-de-koruduk","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/kayip-kacakta-sirketleri-de-tuketiciyi-de-koruduk\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Kay\u0131p-Ka\u00e7akta \u015eirketleri de T\u00fcketiciyi de Koruduk!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

<\/p>\n

Yeni elektrik kanunu tasar\u0131s\u0131nda kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedellerinin yeniden t\u00fcketicilere yans\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fma yarat\u0131rken, bu sayede \u015firketlerin ma\u011fduriyeti \u00f6nlenmi\u015f oldu. EPDK Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Y\u0131lmaz, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak meselelerinde \u015firketleri ma\u011fdur etmemek i\u00e7in kendilerini ortaya koyduklar\u0131n\u0131 belirterek, \u201cKay\u0131p-ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 \u015firketlerden alm\u0131yorlar\u2019 diye hakk\u0131mda savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f d\u00fcnya kadar \u015fikayet var\u201d diye konu\u015ftu.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

TBMM Genel Kurulu\u2019na ge\"elektrikte-kayip-kacak-bedeli\"<\/a>len elektrik piyasas\u0131 yasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi teklifinde elektrik faturalar\u0131 ve kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelleri konusundaki d\u00fczenlemeler tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131yor. Son olarak Elektrik M\u00fchendisleri Odas\u0131\u2019n\u0131n (EMO) mahkeme karar\u0131yla bug\u00fcne kadar geri al\u0131nan kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedellerinin yasa de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi ile tekrar t\u00fcketiciye yans\u0131t\u0131laca\u011f\u0131na dair bir a\u00e7\u0131klama yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n sorulmas\u0131 \u00fczerine Enerji Piyasas\u0131 D\u00fczenleme Kurumu (EPDK) Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mustafa Y\u0131lmaz, \u201cO k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 komisyondan \u00e7\u0131kartt\u0131k. Ge\u00e7mi\u015fteki tarifeye eklenmeyecek, ama gelecekte \u015firketlerin ma\u011fduriyetini \u00f6nlemek i\u00e7in bir yasa tasar\u0131s\u0131 var. Bu da normal bir \u015fey, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli eskiden beri var olan bir \u015fey\u201d cevab\u0131n\u0131 verdi. Aksi takdirde \u015firketlerin \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma imkan\u0131n\u0131n kalmayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 aktaran Y\u0131lmaz \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yledi:<\/p>\n

100 YILDIR B\u00d6YLE<\/strong>
\n\u201cHesap edin, senede 1-2 milyar lira para kazan\u0131yorsun, 5 milyar kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli var. Nas\u0131l olacak? 100 y\u0131ld\u0131r sistem b\u00f6yle i\u015fliyor, b\u00fct\u00fcn d\u00fcnyada da b\u00f6yle. \u0130lgin\u00e7 bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131, o \u00e7ok bo\u015funa \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f bir karar da de\u011fil, bence piyasay\u0131 kar\u0131\u015ft\u0131rmak i\u00e7in \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015f bir karard\u0131. Yarg\u0131daki malum yap\u0131lanmalar\u0131n da etkisiyle bu \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131. Daha \u00f6nceden d\u00fcnya kadar dava a\u00e7\u0131l\u0131yordu, hep b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak hukuk sisteminin gere\u011fi deniliyordu. Kald\u0131 ki bizim kararlar\u0131m\u0131za Dan\u0131\u015ftay bak\u0131yor. Bu \u015firketler zaten b\u00f6yle bir\u015fey olsa b\u0131rak\u0131r giderler, \u2018verdi\u011finiz para da sizin olsun, biz da\u011f\u0131tm\u0131yoruz\u2019 derler.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u015e\u0130RKETLER\u0130 KORUDUK<\/strong>
\nElektrik Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m Hizmetleri Derne\u011fi\u2019nin (ELDER) Trabzon\u2019daki sekt\u00f6r toplant\u0131s\u0131nda hem Enerji Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131, hem EPDK\u2019n\u0131n t\u00fcketici odakl\u0131 mesajlar\u0131 dikkat \u00e7ekti. EPDK Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mustafa Y\u0131lmaz, bu konuda, \u201cElektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketinin kazanaca\u011f\u0131 parada t\u00fcketici belirleyici olacak. Eskiden biraz yat\u0131r\u0131mlarla ilgili s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131lar\u0131 vard\u0131. \u015eimdi 5 y\u0131l i\u00e7in 18 milyar liraya yak\u0131n yat\u0131r\u0131m verdik. Eskiden bu 3 milyar lira civar\u0131ndayd\u0131. Art\u0131k bahaneleri kalmayacak. Biraz \u015febekenin ya\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnerek yat\u0131r\u0131m\u0131 y\u00fcksek tuttuk ki t\u00fcketici memnuniyetinin kesinlikle y\u00fckselmesi laz\u0131m. Tarifeyi de iyi yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z kanaatindeyim. T\u00fcketici memnuniyetini birinci plana al\u0131rken ger\u00e7ekten \u015firketleri de koruduk. Hem makul getiri oran\u0131nda, hem \u015firketlerin baz\u0131 s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 oldu\u011fu d\u00f6nemlerde, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak meselelerinde \u015firketleri ma\u011fdur etmemek i\u00e7in kendimizi ortaya koyduk. Mesela benimle ilgili d\u00fcnya kadar \u015fik\u00e2yet yap\u0131ld\u0131. Savc\u0131l\u0131\u011fa, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 \u015firketlerden alm\u0131yorlar diye \u015fikayet ediyorlar.T\u00fcketici dernekleri, herkes bizimle ilgili \u015fik\u00e2yetlerde bulunuyorlar\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n

Verdi\u011fin para senin olsun<\/strong>
\nEPDK Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Y\u0131lmaz, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n her zaman sistemde oldu\u011funu ancak makul olmas\u0131 gerekti\u011fini vurgulayarak, \u201cBunun d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesiyle ilgili ger\u00e7ekten mesafe ald\u0131k. Birka\u00e7 tane Ar-Ge projemiz var, biz Ar-Ge b\u00fct\u00e7eleri de ay\u0131rd\u0131k. \u00d6zellikle Van\u2019da uyguluyoruz, ciddi mesafe ald\u0131k. Hedefler o b\u00f6lgeler i\u00e7in revize edildi ama ba\u015fka t\u00fcrl\u00fc de ayakta kalamazlar. \u015eirket, \u2018Verdi\u011fi para devletin olsun, ben \u00e7\u0131kmak istiyorum\u2019 diyor. Hakl\u0131, siz de olsan\u0131z, biraz empati yapmak laz\u0131m. Biz bildi\u011fimiz i\u00e7in hem t\u00fcketicileri koruyoruz, hem o hizmetin devam etmesi a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan \u015firketleri de ayakta tutmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yoruz. Zaten biraz \u015febeke sistemlerini pahal\u0131 ald\u0131lar yani ne olursa olsun. Zannettiler ki biz ciddi manada b\u00fcy\u00fck kar elde edece\u011fiz, ben onlara dedim \u2018Buras\u0131 m\u00fcteahhitlik sekt\u00f6r\u00fc de\u011fil, buras\u0131 hizmet sekt\u00f6r\u00fc\u2019. Ama yine de orada (kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n y\u00fcksek oldu\u011fu G\u00fcneydo\u011fu b\u00f6lgesi) ciddi bir s\u0131k\u0131nt\u0131 var. \u0130n\u015fallah oras\u0131 \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc taktirde zaten di\u011fer b\u00f6lgelerde Avrupa ortalamas\u0131nday\u0131z\u201d \u015feklinde konu\u015ftu. G\u00fcneydo\u011fu b\u00f6lgesinde bir sosyal tarife getirilmesi gibi bir \u00e7\u00f6z\u00fcm olup olamayaca\u011f\u0131 \u015feklindeki sorumuzu ise Y\u0131lmaz, \u201cOnu \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131yorlar ciddi bir \u015fekilde kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n oldu\u011fu noktada. Ge\u00e7en hafta \u00f6zellikle \u00fc\u00e7 tane bakan\u0131m\u0131z oraya gitti. Kay\u0131t alt\u0131na al\u0131nmas\u0131 i\u00e7in \u2018kulland\u0131\u011f\u0131n enerjinin bedelinin y\u00fczde 65\u2019ini almayaca\u011f\u0131z, yeter ki al\u0131\u015fkanl\u0131k olu\u015fsun\u2019 denildi. Biz kay\u0131da alal\u0131m, gel sana 2 y\u0131l bedava\u2026 Al\u0131\u015ft\u0131ra al\u0131\u015ft\u0131ra, \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc 40 y\u0131ld\u0131r b\u00f6yle gelmi\u015f. 40 y\u0131ld\u0131r kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7akla ilgili hi\u00e7bir \u015fey olmuyordu. \u015eimdi de bunlar\u0131n hepsinden bizi sorumlu tutmaya kalk\u0131yorlar\u201d diyerek yan\u0131tlad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Yazan:\u00a0Merve Erdil-Ne\u015fe Karanfil<\/p>\n

Haberin Devam\u0131 \u0130\u00e7in\u00a0T\u0131klay\u0131n\u0131z>>><\/a><\/p>\n

Kaynak: H\u00fcrriyet<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language. Yeni elektrik kanunu tasar\u0131s\u0131nda kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedellerinin yeniden t\u00fcketicilere yans\u0131t\u0131lmas\u0131 tart\u0131\u015fma yarat\u0131rken, bu sayede \u015firketlerin ma\u011fduriyeti \u00f6nlenmi\u015f oldu. EPDK Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Y\u0131lmaz, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak meselelerinde […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":41048,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53],"tags":[1824,68,7315,61,19638,1451,2873,63,67,1009,2698,1046,165,750,29604,10708,12996,29603],"views":964,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52842"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52842"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52842\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52844,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52842\/revisions\/52844"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41048"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52842"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52842"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52842"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}