{"id":52685,"date":"2016-05-05T11:56:42","date_gmt":"2016-05-05T08:56:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=52685"},"modified":"2016-05-05T11:56:42","modified_gmt":"2016-05-05T08:56:42","slug":"gayri-safi-yurtici-hasila-gsyh-gece-isiklari-verisi-kullanilip-hesaplandi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/gayri-safi-yurtici-hasila-gsyh-gece-isiklari-verisi-kullanilip-hesaplandi\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Gayri Safi Yurti\u00e7i Has\u0131la (GSYH) Gece I\u015f\u0131klar\u0131 Verisi Kullan\u0131l\u0131p Hesapland\u0131…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

<\/p>\n

TEPAV, T\u00dc\u0130K\u2019in 2001 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana a\u00e7\u0131klamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 il baz\u0131nda Gayri Safi Yurti\u00e7i Has\u0131la (GSYH) rakamlar\u0131n\u0131 \u201cgece \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131 verisi\u201dni kullanarak hesaplad\u0131.<\/strong><\/p>\n

TEPAV Ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar\u0131ndan Seda Ba\u015f\u0131ho\u015f taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada, gece \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131 verisinin ekono\"gayri-safi-yurtici-hasila-gsyh-gece-isiklari-verisi-kullanilip-hesaplandi\"<\/a>mik b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fcnde g\u00fcvenilir ve g\u00fc\u00e7l\u00fc bir veri kayna\u011f\u0131 oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekilerek, \u201cGSYH de\u011ferleri hesaplanmayan ya da eksik hesaplanan alt b\u00f6lgeler i\u00e7in temsil g\u00fcc\u00fc y\u00fcksek bir \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm sunmaktad\u0131r. Gece \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131 verileri ekonomik aktivitelerin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fc i\u00e7in yak\u0131n bir temsil olu\u015fturdu\u011fu gibi, n\u00fcfus hareketleri, \u015fehir dinamikleri ve b\u00f6lgesel geli\u015fmi\u015fliklerin \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcm\u00fcnde de kapsaml\u0131 bir \u00e7al\u0131\u015fma alan\u0131 sunmaktad\u0131r\u201d denildi.<\/p>\n

A\u00e7\u0131klamaya \u015f\u00f6yle devam edildi:<\/p>\n

\u201cBu \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmada, 2001 ile 2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda illerin reel GSYH\u2019leri hesaplanm\u0131\u015f ve kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Buna g\u00f6re,\u00a0 2001 y\u0131l\u0131ndan 2013 y\u0131l\u0131na kadar T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin b\u00fcy\u00fcyen ekonomisine paralel olarak, illerin reel GSYH de\u011ferleri artm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. 2001-2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda en fazla b\u00fcy\u00fcyen illerin, orta-y\u00fcksek gelirli iller oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin bat\u0131s\u0131nda yer alan, sanayi sekt\u00f6r\u00fc geli\u015fmi\u015f illerin b\u00fcy\u00fcmelerindeki yava\u015flama ise \u00e7al\u0131\u015fman\u0131n bir di\u011fer bulgusudur.<\/p>\n

\u0130llerin b\u00fcy\u00fcme trendi, T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin genel b\u00fcy\u00fcme trendiyle olduk\u00e7a benzer olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen, k\u00fcresel ekonomiyle ba\u011flant\u0131s\u0131 kuvvetli olan \u0130stanbul ve Kocaeli gibi end\u00fcstriyel \u015fehirlerin 2008\u2019deki k\u00fcresel \u00f6l\u00e7ekli krize daha duyarl\u0131 oldu\u011fu g\u00f6r\u00fclm\u00fc\u015ft\u00fcr. Ayr\u0131ca h\u0131zl\u0131 geli\u015fim g\u00f6steren ikincil illerin, bu krizden daha az etkilendi\u011fi de g\u00f6zlemlenmektedir.\u201d<\/p>\n

-2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda en fazla has\u0131la 117 milyar dolar ile \u0130stanbul\u2019da\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

TEPAV\u2019\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na g\u00f6re, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda en fazla has\u0131laya 117 milyar dolar (sabit 2005) ile \u0130stanbul sahip oldu. \u0130stanbul\u2019u yakla\u015f\u0131k 52 milyar dolar (sabit 2005) ile \u0130zmir ve Ankara takip etti. \u0130stanbul \u00a02013 y\u0131l\u0131nda tek ba\u015f\u0131na T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin GSYH\u2019nin 6\u2019da 1\u2019ni olu\u015fturuyor. \u0130lk \u00fc\u00e7 s\u0131radaki \u0130stanbul, Ankara ve \u0130zmir ise ayn\u0131 y\u0131l i\u00e7in T\u00fcrkiye GSYH\u2019nin yakla\u015f\u0131k 10\u2019da 4\u2019n\u00fc ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirdi. Ayr\u0131ca, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130stanbul\u2019un GSYH\u2019si, Romanya ve Macaristan\u2019\u0131n GSYH\u2019yle neredeyse ayn\u0131 d\u00fczeyde; Bulgaristan, H\u0131rvatistan ve Azerbaycan gibi \u00fclkelerinkinden ise y\u00fcksek oldu. Ayn\u0131 y\u0131l i\u00e7in ilk \u00fc\u00e7 ilin toplam GSYH\u2019si, Finlandiya, \u0130rlanda ve Malezya gibi \u00fclkelerinkiyle neredeyse ayn\u0131 d\u00fczeydeyken; Portekiz, \u0130srail ve Yunanistan gibi \u00fclkelerden y\u00fcksek ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti. Di\u011fer bir de\u011fi\u015fle, 2013 y\u0131l\u0131nda \u0130stanbul, d\u00fcnyadaki 252 \u00fclkenin 143\u2019\u00fcnden; Ankara ve \u0130zmir\u2019le birlikte ise 163\u2019\u00fcnden daha b\u00fcy\u00fck GSYH\u2019ye sahip oldu.<\/p>\n

-En d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck GSYH Ardahan\u2019da\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00c7al\u0131\u015fmada, en d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck GSYH de\u011ferine sahip olan il Ardahan (300 milyon dolar) olarak belirlendi. Ardahan\u2019\u0131 yakla\u015f\u0131k benzer GSYH d\u00fczeyinde s\u0131ras\u0131yla Bayburt, Tunceli, Hakk\u00e2ri ve I\u011fd\u0131r izledi. Bu be\u015f ilin GSYH de\u011ferlerinin toplam\u0131 Maldiv Adalar\u0131n\u2019n\u0131n ve Karada\u011f\u2019\u0131n GSYH de\u011ferine yak\u0131nken; Afrika\u2019daki Burundi ve Avrupa\u2019daki Andora\u2019dan y\u00fcksek oldu. Ayr\u0131ca, bu illerin toplam GSYH de\u011feri d\u00fcnyan\u0131n 33 \u00fclkesinin GSYH de\u011ferinden daha b\u00fcy\u00fck hesapland\u0131.<\/p>\n

-2008\u2019den sonra h\u0131zl\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fcme\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

Genel olarak illerin 2001 ile 2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki b\u00fcy\u00fcme trendi T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin b\u00fcy\u00fcme trendiyle olduk\u00e7a benzerlik g\u00f6sterdi. \u0130llerin neredeyse hepsi 2008 bunal\u0131m\u0131ndan sonra h\u0131zl\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fcme performans\u0131 sergiledi. Di\u011fer yandan 2008 k\u00fcresel krizinden en fazla etkilenen illerden biri, \u0130stanbul oldu. \u0130stanbul\u2019un GSYH\u2019si 2008\u2019den 2009\u2019a %6,8 darald\u0131. 2009\u2019daki dipten sonra 2010 y\u0131l\u0131ndaki en yava\u015f toparlanma yine \u0130stanbul\u2019da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fti (%5,7 b\u00fcy\u00fcme). 2008 krizinden az etkilenen il ise Hatay oldu. Hatay ekonomisi 2009\u2019den 2008\u2019e sadece %0,4 darald\u0131.<\/p>\n

2001-2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda en fazla b\u00fcy\u00fcyen il %146 ile Hatay olarak belirlendi. 2001-2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda en fazla b\u00fcy\u00fcyen ilk 10 ilin i\u00e7inde 2001\u2019den \u00f6nce yak\u0131n zamanda il stat\u00fcs\u00fcne kavu\u015fan Yalova, D\u00fczce ve Osmaniye de yerald\u0131. 49 il 2001-2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131nda T\u00fcrkiye ortalamas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinde b\u00fcy\u00fcrken, \u0130stanbul ve Kocaeli\u2019nin de i\u00e7inde bulundu\u011fu 32 il ortalaman\u0131n gerisinde kald\u0131.\u00a0 Buna g\u00f6re, \u0130stanbul en az b\u00fcy\u00fcyen illerin aras\u0131nda bulunuyor. Di\u011fer yandan, \u0130stanbul T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin her 1 puanl\u0131k ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fcmesine 0,2 puanla en fazla katk\u0131 veren il oldu. B\u00f6yle b\u00fcy\u00fck bir ekonominin, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck illerin ekonomisi kadar h\u0131zl\u0131 b\u00fcy\u00fcmemesi beklenilen bir durum olarak de\u011ferlendirildi.<\/p>\n

-10 y\u0131lda y\u00fczde 60 b\u00fcy\u00fcme\u2026<\/strong><\/p>\n

TEPAV\u2019\u0131n \u00e7al\u0131\u015fmas\u0131na g\u00f6re,T\u00fcrkiye ekonomisi, 2003\u2019ten 2013\u2019e 10 y\u0131ll\u0131k periyodda y\u00fczde 60 b\u00fcy\u00fcd\u00fc. \u0130llerin 1992-2013 y\u0131llar\u0131 aras\u0131ndaki b\u00fcy\u00fcme performanslar\u0131na g\u00f6re, ekonomik b\u00fcy\u00fckl\u00fcklerinden ba\u011f\u0131ms\u0131z olarak y\u00fczde 60 oran\u0131nda b\u00fcy\u00fcmeleri i\u00e7in ortalama 14 y\u0131l ge\u00e7mesi gerekiyor.\u00a0 \u0130llerin 30\u2019u 14 y\u0131ldan daha fazla s\u00fcrede; 27\u2019si 14 y\u0131lda; 24\u2019\u00fc ise 14 y\u0131ldan daha az s\u00fcrede y\u00fczde 60 b\u00fcy\u00fcyebildi. En az s\u00fcrede (5 y\u0131l) b\u00fcy\u00fcyebilen il Nev\u015fehir\u2019ken, en uzun s\u00fcrede (22) b\u00fcy\u00fcyebilen il \u00c7anakkale oldu. \u00c7anakkale\u2019yi 20 y\u0131ll\u0131k b\u00fcy\u00fcme s\u00fcresiyle Hakk\u00e2ri ve Ad\u0131yaman takip etti.<\/p>\n

-Y\u00f6ntem<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00c7al\u0131\u015fmada y\u00f6nteme ili\u015fkin olarak \u015fu ifadelere yer verildi:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u0130l baz\u0131nda elde edilen gece \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131 verileri sinyal s\u00fcre\u00e7leme ile filtrelenmi\u015ftir. 2001 y\u0131l\u0131 \u0131\u015f\u0131k verisi 100 olacak \u015fekilde 2001-2013 aras\u0131nda b\u00fct\u00fcn illerin \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131ndaki oransal b\u00fcy\u00fcme hesaplanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. Daha sonra T\u00dc\u0130K taraf\u0131ndan en son 2001 y\u0131l\u0131nda a\u00e7\u0131klanan 1987 fiyatlar\u0131yla il baz\u0131nda GSYH ile normalize edilen \u0131\u015f\u0131k de\u011ferleri \u00e7arp\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131r. B\u00f6ylelikle 2001-2013 aras\u0131nda il baz\u0131nda 1987 fiyatlar\u0131yla temsili GSYH hesaplanm\u0131\u015f ve 2005 sabit dolar fiyatlar\u0131na \u00e7evrilmi\u015ftir\u201d<\/p>\n

Kaynak:\u00a0TEPAV<\/a><\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language. TEPAV, T\u00dc\u0130K\u2019in 2001 y\u0131l\u0131ndan bu yana a\u00e7\u0131klamad\u0131\u011f\u0131 il baz\u0131nda Gayri Safi Yurti\u00e7i Has\u0131la (GSYH) rakamlar\u0131n\u0131 \u201cgece \u0131\u015f\u0131klar\u0131 verisi\u201dni kullanarak hesaplad\u0131. TEPAV Ara\u015ft\u0131rmac\u0131lar\u0131ndan […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":52686,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[53],"tags":[63,67,1009,2698,165,18685,29529,29530,29531,18686,29532],"views":1408,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52685"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52685"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52685\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52687,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52685\/revisions\/52687"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/52686"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52685"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52685"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52685"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}