{"id":50235,"date":"2016-02-10T13:29:09","date_gmt":"2016-02-10T10:29:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=50235"},"modified":"2016-02-10T13:29:09","modified_gmt":"2016-02-10T10:29:09","slug":"kayip-kacak-elektrik-yonetmeligi-yargida","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/kayip-kacak-elektrik-yonetmeligi-yargida\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Kay\u0131p-Ka\u00e7ak Elektrik Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fi Yarg\u0131da…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

<\/p>\n

EMO, elektri\u011fin bildirimsiz kesilmesi, t\u00fcketicilere tazminat \u00f6denmemesi, elektri\u011fin kaliteli sunulmamas\u0131, verimlilik kriterlerine uyulmamas\u0131 gibi kay\u0131p ve ka\u00e7a\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6nlem getirmek yerine \u00f6zendirilen h\u00fck\u00fcmlerin oldu\u011fu gerek\u00e7esiyle y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin iptali ve y\u00fcr\u00fctmesinin durdurulmas\u0131 istedi.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

EMO taraf\u0131ndan Dan\u0131\u015ftay`a 8 \u015eubat 2016 a\u00e7\u0131lan davada; \u00f6ncelikle y\u00f6netmeli\u011fe dayanak g\u00f6sterilen Elektrik P\"kayip-kacak-elektrik-yonetmeligi-yargida\"<\/a>iyasas\u0131 Yasas\u0131`n\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 18. Maddesi`nde \u2018kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak oran\u0131 y\u00fcksek b\u00f6lgelerdeki bu oranlar\u0131n \u00fclke ortalamas\u0131n\u0131n alt\u0131na d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcr\u00fclmesinin\u2019 ama\u00e7land\u0131\u011f\u0131 vurguland\u0131. Ancak y\u00f6netmelikteki baz\u0131 maddelerin; kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak oran\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeye de\u011fil, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak oran\u0131 y\u00fcksek \u015firketleri enerji kalitesi ba\u015fta olmak \u00fczere baz\u0131 teknik ve idari y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerden muaf tutmaya y\u00f6nelik oldu\u011funa dikkat \u00e7ekildi. Y\u00fcksek kay\u0131p ve ka\u00e7ak oran\u0131 olan \u015firketlerin, esasen hizmet kalitesiyle ilgili y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerin hemen tamam\u0131ndan muaf tutulduklar\u0131 saptanan\u00a0dava\u00a0dilek\u00e7esinde, bu muafiyetlerin hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131klar\u0131 ortaya konuldu.<\/p>\n

Dava dilek\u00e7esinde, ka\u00e7ak\u00a0elektrik\u00a0kullan\u0131m\u0131nda \u2018yerinde tespit\u2019 \u015fart\u0131n\u0131 ortadan kald\u0131ran d\u00fczenlemeye de EPDK`n\u0131n ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hal uygulamalar\u0131na \u00f6zg\u00fc tan\u0131mlama yapma yetkisi olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirtilerek itiraz edildi. Neresi oldu\u011fu anla\u015f\u0131lamayan \u2018ilgili kurum\u2019 taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lacak belgelendirmeye dayal\u0131 \u2018g\u00fcvenlik nedeniyle ka\u00e7ak kontrol\u00fc yap\u0131lamayan yerler\u2019 tan\u0131mlamas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak\u00a0dilek\u00e7ede\u00a0\u015f\u00f6yle denildi: \u201c\u00dclkemizde s\u0131k\u0131y\u00f6netim ya da ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hal ilan edilmi\u015f herhangi bir b\u00f6lge bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 bilinmektedir. B\u00f6yle bir belirlemenin hangi organlar eliyle yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131, Anayasa\u2019n\u0131n 119 ve devam\u0131 maddelerinde yer almaktad\u0131r. Daval\u0131 EPDK`n\u0131n ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc hal uygulamalar\u0131na \u00f6zg\u00fc tan\u0131mlamalar yapma, bu tan\u0131mlamalar \u00fczerinden \u00f6zel \u015firketlere ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc yetki tan\u0131yan y\u00f6netmelik haz\u0131rlamas\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131k\u00e7a Anayasa`ya ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu gibi, Y\u00f6netmeli\u011fin dayana\u011f\u0131 olan 6446 say\u0131l\u0131 Yasa`n\u0131n Ge\u00e7ici 18. Maddesinde de b\u00f6yle bir yetki belirlenmemi\u015ftir. \u00dclkede g\u00fcvenlik nedeniyle girilemeyecek yerlerin bulunup bulunmad\u0131\u011f\u0131na, varsa b\u00f6yle yerler nas\u0131l girilece\u011fine ya da bu yerlerle ilgili hangi kurum ve g\u00f6revlilerin nas\u0131l hareket edeceklerine yasama organ\u0131 karar verebilir. Ayr\u0131ca g\u00fcvenlik nedeniyle ka\u00e7ak kontrol\u00fc yap\u0131lamad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00fcvenlik g\u00fc\u00e7leri taraf\u0131ndan de\u011fil de \u00f6zel \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan tespit edilmesi de hukuka ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k ta\u015f\u0131maktad\u0131r.\u201d<\/p>\n

EMO`nun a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davada, hizmet kalitesine y\u00f6nelik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketlerine getirilen y\u00fck\u00fcml\u00fcl\u00fcklerinden baz\u0131 \u015firketlerin muaf tutulmas\u0131n\u0131n EPDK`ya yasayla verilmi\u015f g\u00f6revlere de ayk\u0131r\u0131l\u0131k olu\u015fturdu\u011fu vurguland\u0131. Yasan\u0131n ama\u00e7 maddesine ayk\u0131r\u0131 olan bu d\u00fczenlemenin tam tersine EPDK`n\u0131n kalitesiz enerji sunumu ya da kesintilerden kaynaklanan zarar ve hasarlar\u0131n tazminine ili\u015fkin usul ve esaslar\u0131 d\u00fczenlemekle sorumlu tutuldu\u011fu belirtildi.<\/p>\n

Dilek\u00e7ede, y\u00fcksek kay\u0131pl\u0131 \u015firket stat\u00fcs\u00fc kazand\u0131r\u0131lan \u015firketlere getirilen muafiyetler ve olanaklar nedeniyle bu stat\u00fcy\u00fc kaybetmek istemeyeceklerinin alt\u0131 \u00e7izildi. Bu nedenle kay\u0131p ve ka\u00e7ak oranlar\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmemeye ya da ka\u011f\u0131t \u00fczerinde y\u00fcksek g\u00f6stermeye \u00f6zendiren i\u00e7erikteki bu d\u00fczenlemenin Elektrik Piyasas\u0131 Yasas\u0131`n\u0131n amac\u0131na ve kamu yarar\u0131na ayk\u0131r\u0131 oldu\u011fu kaydedildi.<\/p>\n

Kaynak: Enerji Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language. EMO, elektri\u011fin bildirimsiz kesilmesi, t\u00fcketicilere tazminat \u00f6denmemesi, elektri\u011fin kaliteli sunulmamas\u0131, verimlilik kriterlerine uyulmamas\u0131 gibi kay\u0131p ve ka\u00e7a\u011fa kar\u015f\u0131 \u00f6nlem getirmek yerine \u00f6zendirilen […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":50236,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53],"tags":[28437,28438,68,61,19638,1451,28439,2873,1103,63,67,1009,2698,165,750,28440,28441,28442,28443],"views":862,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50235"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50235"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50235\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50237,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50235\/revisions\/50237"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/50236"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50235"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50235"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50235"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}