{"id":38045,"date":"2015-04-09T11:41:09","date_gmt":"2015-04-09T08:41:09","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=38045"},"modified":"2015-04-09T11:43:08","modified_gmt":"2015-04-09T08:43:08","slug":"kayip-kacakta-sil-bastan","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/kayip-kacakta-sil-bastan\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Kay\u0131p-Ka\u00e7akta Sil Ba\u015ftan…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

<\/p>\n

Elektrikte ka\u00e7ak kullan\u0131m\u0131n olu\u015fturdu\u011fu maliyeti abonelerin s\u0131rt\u0131na y\u00fckleyen tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 kanun tasar\u0131s\u0131 Meclis\u2019ten \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131. T\u00fcketici Birli\u011fi Federasyonu Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet B\u00fclent Deniz, \u201cTasar\u0131 Meclis\u2019e geldi\u011finde t\u00fcketicilere kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak iadesi i\u00e7in art\u0131k m\u00fcracaat etmeyin demi\u015ftik. T\u00fcketiciler ba\u015fvurulara aynen devam edebilir\u201d diyor.<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n

T\u00fcketici vicdan\u0131n\u0131 rahats\u0131z eden elektrik faturalar\u0131ndaki kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelini kal\u0131c\u0131 hale getirecek tasar\u0131, Meclis\u2019ten \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131. Kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak davalar\u0131n\u0131n da \u00f6n\u00fcn\u00fc t\u0131kayacak tasar\u0131n\u0131n yeni Meclis a\u00e7\u0131lana kadar h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131\u00a0a\u00e7\u0131klayan T\u00fcketici Birli\u011fi Federasyonu Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet B\u00fclent Deniz, \u201cBiz tasar\u0131 TBMM\u2019ye geldi\u011finde t\u00fcketiciye \u00e7a\u011fr\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015f ve \u2018Kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli iadesi i\u00e7in art\u0131k m\u00fcracaat etmeyin \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc kazansan\u0131z bile ald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131z paralar tarifeye yoluyla 75 milyondan \u00e7\u0131kacak\u2019 veya \u2018yasa \u00e7\u0131karsa ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131z oldu\u011fu yerde duracak ve d\u00fc\u015fecek\u2019 demi\u015ftik. Ama \u015fimdi \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczde y\"K\"<\/a>eni Meclis kurulana kadar en az alt\u0131 ay zaman oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyoruz ve tasar\u0131yla ilgili ne olaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 bilmiyoruz. T\u00fcketiciler kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedellerinin iadesi i\u00e7in ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131 yapmaya devam edebilir\u201d diyor.<\/p>\n

Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu\u2019nun ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz aylarda ald\u0131\u011f\u0131, \u201c\u00c7al\u0131nan elektri\u011fin paras\u0131, d\u00fczenli fatura \u00f6deyen aboneden tahsil edilemez\u201d karar\u0131, t\u00fcketicileri harekete ge\u00e7irmi\u015f, binlerce elektrik abonesi geriye d\u00f6n\u00fck \u00f6dedi\u011fi kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedellerini almak i\u00e7in solu\u011fu elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleri ve t\u00fcketici hakem heyetlerinde alm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bunun ard\u0131ndan kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelini yasalla\u015ft\u0131ran ve bu bedelle ilgili yarg\u0131lama yetkisini s\u0131n\u0131rlayan bir tasar\u0131 haz\u0131rlanarak 28 Ocak tarihinde TBMM\u2019ye g\u00f6nderildi ve ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz ay Meclis Komisyonu\u2019nda kabul edildi. Hem elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleri, hem t\u00fcketici derneklerinin g\u00f6z\u00fc s\u00f6z konusu tasar\u0131 \u00fczerindeydi. Tasar\u0131 TBMM\u2019den \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131. T\u00fcketici Birli\u011fi Federasyonu Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet B\u00fclent Deniz, \u201cYarg\u0131tay karar\u0131 hala \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczde duruyor ve ciddi bir \u00f6rnektir. Yeni Meclis\u2019in bunu dikkate almas\u0131n\u0131 da sa\u011flamak i\u00e7in, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak konusunda ba\u015fvurular\u0131n t\u00fcketiciler taraf\u0131ndan yo\u011fun \u015fekilde yap\u0131lmas\u0131nda yarar oldu\u011funu d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcn\u00fcyoruz\u201d \u015feklinde konu\u015fuyor.<\/p>\n

KAD\u00dcK OLDU<\/strong><\/p>\n

TBMM\u2019nin g\u00f6rev s\u00fcresi bitince, o ana kadar hen\u00fcz yasala\u015fmam\u0131\u015f olan yasa teklifleri ve tasar\u0131lar\u0131n h\u00fck\u00fcms\u00fcz kald\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131, yani kad\u00fck oldu\u011funu ifade eden Deniz, \u015funlar\u0131 s\u00f6yl\u00fcyor: \u201cYeni Meclis olu\u015fturuldu\u011funda i\u00e7 t\u00fcz\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn 77. maddesi gere\u011fince bu kad\u00fck hale gelmi\u015f olan tasar\u0131 ve teklifler milletvekilleri taraf\u0131ndan yenilenebilir. Dolay\u0131s\u0131yla bu kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak yasa tasar\u0131s\u0131yla alakal\u0131 \u015fu anlama geliyor: 7 Haziran\u2019da se\u00e7im yap\u0131lacak, \u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fczdeki ekim ay\u0131na kadar ola\u011fan\u00fcst\u00fc bir geli\u015fme olmazsa kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7akla ilgili mevcut yasa tasar\u0131s\u0131 t\u00fcketici a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan ba\u011flay\u0131c\u0131 olmayacak. Ve uygulanamayacak. Yarg\u0131tay Hukuk Genel Kurulu karar\u0131ndan sonra binlerce t\u00fcketici hakem heyetlerine ba\u015fvurmu\u015f ve hakem heyetleri kilitlenmi\u015fti. Bu tepki \u00fczerine Bakanl\u0131k b\u00f6yle bir tasar\u0131y\u0131 Meclis\u2019e g\u00f6nderdi. Tekrar b\u00f6yle y\u0131\u011f\u0131nsal ba\u015fvurular yap\u0131lmas\u0131 halinde iki tane yarar ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak: 1) T\u00fcketicinin kazanmas\u0131 halinde, t\u00fcketici paras\u0131n\u0131 geri alacak, 2) T\u00fcketicinin tepkisi yeni olu\u015facak Meclis\u2019e bu \u015fekilde ifade edilmi\u015f olacak. Bu tepki ciddi \u015fekilde ifade edilmi\u015f olursa, teklif yeni Meclis\u2019te yenilenmeme pozisyonuna gelebilir.\u201d<\/p>\n

Tasar\u0131 ge\u00e7erse faturaya yans\u0131r<\/h2>\n

Kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak tasar\u0131s\u0131, bu haliyle yeni Meclis\u2019ten \u00e7\u0131karsa kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli kal\u0131c\u0131 hale gelmi\u015f olacak. Daha \u00f6nce hukuki y\u00f6ntemlerle geri al\u0131nan bedellerin ise tekrar vatanda\u015flara ek y\u00fck olarak getirilmesinin \u00f6n\u00fc a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015f olacak. Tasar\u0131, bu haliyle yasala\u015f\u0131rsa kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeline ili\u015fkin ba\u015fvurularda ve a\u00e7\u0131lan davalarda, t\u00fcketici hakem heyetleri ile mahkemelerin yetkisi, \u00fcr\u00fcn veya hizmet bedellerinin, EPDK\u2019n\u0131n d\u00fczenleyici i\u015flemlerine uygunlu\u011funun denetimi ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 olacak. Mahkeme ve t\u00fcketici hakem heyeti karar\u0131na istinaden, yap\u0131lan iadeler ve mahkeme giderleri ise tarife yoluyla kar\u015f\u0131lanacak. Bir ki\u015fi kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelinin iadesine ili\u015fkin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 davay\u0131 kazansa bile bunun kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131 yine da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m tarifelerine eklenecek.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fvuruyu engelleyen yasa \u015fimdilik yok<\/h2>\n

Mehmet B\u00fclent Deniz \u201cT\u00fcketici olarak \u015fu an ba\u015fvurmak istesem bir kayb\u0131m olur mu\u201d sorusuna kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131k, \u201cT\u00fcketici olarak bug\u00fcn ba\u015fvurdunuz ve diyelim ki yasa \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131 ve ba\u015fvurunuz d\u00fc\u015ft\u00fc. Hi\u00e7bir kayb\u0131n\u0131z yok. Hakem heyetine ba\u015fvururken zaten herhangi bir masraf \u00f6demiyorsunuz. Avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti de olmayacak \u00e7\u00fcnk\u00fc dava otomatik olarak d\u00fc\u015fm\u00fc\u015f olaca\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in avukatl\u0131k \u00fccreti de tahakkuk etmeyecektir. Ancak bu ba\u015fvurular\u0131n yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve g\u00f6sterilen toplumsal refleks, yeni olu\u015facak Meclis i\u00e7in i\u015faret fi\u015fe\u011fi olabilir\u201d yan\u0131t\u0131n\u0131 veriyor. T\u00fcketicinin \u015fu an ba\u015fvurmas\u0131n\u0131 engelleyen hi\u00e7bir yasa olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 vurgulayan Deniz, \u201cHer \u015fey aral\u0131k ay\u0131ndaki duruma d\u00f6nd\u00fc\u201d yorumunu yap\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015fka se\u00e7ene\u011fi yok<\/h2>\n

Elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m sekt\u00f6r\u00fc temsilcileri ise \u201cOrtada bir yarg\u0131 karar\u0131 oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in da\u011f\u0131t\u0131c\u0131lar\u0131n \u00e7ok bir se\u00e7ene\u011fi yok. Devam eden davalarda belli kararlar \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131k\u00e7a da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleri \u00f6demeleri yap\u0131yorlar. Bu y\u00f6netilemeyen bir risk, kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelinin da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketlerinden \u00e7\u0131kmamas\u0131 gerekiyor. Bir an \u00f6nce konu g\u00fcndeme gelmeli. Kanuni bir d\u00fczenlemeyle EPDK\u2019n\u0131n yetkileri kanunda netle\u015ftirilmeli ve s\u00fcre\u00e7 \u00f6yle y\u00f6netilmeli. Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketlerine verilen sorumluluk belirlenen kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak hedeflerini y\u00f6netmek. Ayr\u0131ca kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak oranlar\u0131 hep b\u00f6yleydi. Sadece faturalarda g\u00f6z\u00fckmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in bilinmiyordu. \u2018Ben niye \u00f6d\u00fcyorum\u2019 son derece makul bir soru ancak bu sorun \u00f6zelle\u015ftirme sonucu do\u011fmu\u015f gibi anlatmak yanl\u0131\u015f. Tam tersine bu sorunlar ortadan kalks\u0131n diye \u00f6zelle\u015ftirme yap\u0131ld\u0131. \u00d6zelle\u015ftirildikten sonra b\u00f6lgesindeki kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak oran\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcrmeyen \u015firket yok. Sadece \u015fu var: Devletin kay\u0131tlar\u0131nda verilen rakamlar sa\u011fl\u0131kl\u0131 de\u011fil. \u00d6rne\u011fin devletin kay\u0131tlar\u0131 kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131 y\u00fczde 50 g\u00f6steriyor, fiili durum ise y\u00fczde 60.\u201d<\/p>\n

Haberin Devam\u0131 i\u00e7in\u00a0t\u0131klay\u0131n\u0131z>>><\/a><\/p>\n

Kaynak: H\u00fcrriyet<\/p>\n

<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language. Elektrikte ka\u00e7ak kullan\u0131m\u0131n olu\u015fturdu\u011fu maliyeti abonelerin s\u0131rt\u0131na y\u00fckleyen tart\u0131\u015fmal\u0131 kanun tasar\u0131s\u0131 Meclis\u2019ten \u00e7\u0131kmad\u0131. T\u00fcketici Birli\u011fi Federasyonu Genel Ba\u015fkan\u0131 Mehmet B\u00fclent Deniz, \u201cTasar\u0131 […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":38046,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53],"tags":[68,15016,61,4061,20853,22314,63,67,1009,2698,165,4237,22315,2805,21176,16416],"views":731,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38045"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38045"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38045\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38048,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38045\/revisions\/38048"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38046"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38045"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38045"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38045"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}