{"id":29028,"date":"2014-07-08T08:34:48","date_gmt":"2014-07-08T05:34:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=29028"},"modified":"2014-07-08T20:24:22","modified_gmt":"2014-07-08T17:24:22","slug":"greenpeace-akkuyu-ced-raporu-hala-eksiklerle-dolu","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/greenpeace-akkuyu-ced-raporu-hala-eksiklerle-dolu\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Greenpeace: Akkuyu \u00c7ED Raporu H\u00e2l\u00e2 Eksiklerle Dolu&#8230;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"qtranxs-available-languages-message qtranxs-available-languages-message-en\">Sorry, this entry is only available in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/tr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29028\" class=\"qtranxs-available-language-link qtranxs-available-language-link-tr\" title=\"Turkish\">Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p><p><strong>Akkuyu\u2019da kurulmas\u0131 planlanan n\u00fckleer santralin, \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na 3. Kez sunulan \u00c7ED raporunu de\u011ferlendiren Greenpeace, projeyle ilgili hala eksik pek \u00e7ok noktan\u0131n oldu\u011funu vurgulad\u0131.<\/strong><span id=\"more-66100\"><\/span><\/p>\n<p>Yakla\u015f\u0131k 4000 sayfal\u0131k rapordaki en \u00f6nemli eksikliklerden biri, n\u00fckleer kaza halinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak zarar\u0131n sorumlusunun kim olaca\u011f\u0131 sorusuna raporda cevap verilmemesi.<\/p>\n<p>7 Temmuz 2014, \u0130stanbul Greenpeace, Akkuyu\u2019da kurulmas\u0131 planlanan n\u00fckleer santralin \u00c7ED (\u00c7evresel Etki De\u011ferl<a href=\"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/akkuyu-n\u00fckleer-gs-27983297823.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-29029\" src=\"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/akkuyu-n\u00fckleer-gs-27983297823-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"akkuyu-n\u00fckleer-gs-27983297823\" width=\"300\" height=\"199\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/akkuyu-n\u00fckleer-gs-27983297823-300x199.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/akkuyu-n\u00fckleer-gs-27983297823-500x331.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/akkuyu-n\u00fckleer-gs-27983297823-75x50.jpg 75w, https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/07\/akkuyu-n\u00fckleer-gs-27983297823.jpg 860w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>endirmesi) raporunu de\u011ferlendirdi. De\u011ferlendirmeye g\u00f6re, raporda sorumluluk konusundan n\u00fckleer at\u0131klara ve g\u00fcvenlik konusuna kadar pek \u00e7ok alanda eksiklikler var.<\/p>\n<p>N\u00fckleer santraldeki risklerin hi\u00e7bir ko\u015fulda s\u0131f\u0131ra indirilemedi\u011fini, \u00f6zellikle tasar\u0131m hatalar\u0131, do\u011fal afetler ve insan hatalar\u0131n\u0131n en iyi teknoloji olsa bile risk fakt\u00f6rleri oldu\u011funu ifade eden Greenpeace Akdeniz \u0130klim ve Enerji Kampanyas\u0131 Sorumlusu P\u0131nar Akso\u011fan, \u201cBu ger\u00e7e\u011fi en son Fuku\u015fima kazas\u0131nda g\u00f6rd\u00fck. Bug\u00fcn Akkuyu N\u00fckleer Enerji Santrali Projesi\u2019nin \u015feffaf olmayan bir \u015fekilde i\u015fletilen \u00c7ED s\u00fcreci sonucunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kan rapor, projeye ili\u015fkin her t\u00fcrl\u00fc maliyet analizine yer verirken, n\u00fckleer kaza halinde ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak zarar\u0131n sorumlusunun kim olaca\u011f\u0131 sorusuna cevap veremiyor. Fuku\u015fima kazas\u0131 sonras\u0131, santralin i\u015fletmecisi TEPCO\u2019nun hukuki sorumlulu\u011fu \u00fczerine almam\u0131\u015f olmas\u0131, sorumluluk konusunun, n\u00fckleer enerji santrallerinin meydana getirdi\u011fi felaketlerin yeni ve sakl\u0131 kalan boyutunu ortaya koydu. Rapor\u2019da t\u00fcm hukuki sorumlulu\u011fun adresi olarak g\u00f6sterilen Akkuyu NGS \u015firketi, sermayesi ile s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 bir \u015firket oldu\u011fu i\u00e7in, Akkuyu\u2019da ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmesi olas\u0131 bir kaza sonras\u0131, \u015firketin hukuki sorumlulu\u011fu \u00fczerine alma kabiliyeti yok. Ayr\u0131ca \u00c7ED\u2019de referans verilen, sorumlulu\u011fun nas\u0131l d\u00fczenlenece\u011fini belirten uluslararas\u0131 anla\u015fmalar da yetersiz. K\u0131sacas\u0131 mevcut durumda, olas\u0131 bir kaza halinde maddi zarar\u0131n halk\u0131n cebinden \u00e7\u0131kan vergilerden al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 anl\u0131yoruz\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n<p>Greenpeace\u2019in, \u00c7ED raporundaki eksikliklerle ilgili alt\u0131n\u0131 \u00e7izdi\u011fi di\u011fer noktalar \u015fu \u015fekilde:<\/p>\n<p>Denenmemi\u015f bir reakt\u00f6r Hen\u00fcz d\u00fcnyada denenmemi\u015f bir reakt\u00f6r tipi kullan\u0131lacak ve rapor da buna dayal\u0131 tahminlerle yaz\u0131lm\u0131\u015f durumda.<\/p>\n<p>G\u00fcvenlik \u015fartlar\u0131 ile ilgili bilgiler s\u0131n\u0131rl\u0131 T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de uygulanacak ulusal g\u00fcvenlik \u015fartlar\u0131 ve bunlar\u0131n nas\u0131l uygulanaca\u011f\u0131na dair bilgiler yetersiz. Raporda Avrupa standartlar\u0131na uyulaca\u011f\u0131 s\u00f6yleniyor, oysa ki EUR (European Utility Requirements) standartlar\u0131 g\u00fcvenlik standartlar\u0131 de\u011fil; \u015firketler ve toplumun daha iyi anlamas\u0131 i\u00e7in tasar\u0131m, in\u015faat ve operasyon ad\u0131na gerekli \u015fartlar\u0131 olu\u015fturmak i\u00e7in baz\u0131 genel g\u00fcvenlik \u015fartlar\u0131 i\u00e7eriyor. Akkuyu NGS\u2019de uygulanacak, ve denenmemi\u015f bir model olan reakt\u00f6r\u00fcn tasar\u0131m\u0131n\u0131 ve Rosatom\u2019un bu \u015fartlara uyup uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ise bilmiyoruz. Amerika\u2019n\u0131n California eyaletinde Mitsubishi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan bir santralde hatal\u0131 par\u00e7an\u0131n teminat\u0131 m\u00fcmk\u00fcn olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 i\u00e7in santral kapat\u0131ld\u0131.<\/p>\n<p>Acil durum plan\u0131 sadece 5 km. \u00e7ap\u0131n\u0131 kaps\u0131yor Oysa bir kaza olmas\u0131 durumunda T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin tamam\u0131 ve kom\u015fu \u00fclkeler de radyasyondan etkilenecek.<\/p>\n<h3>Fuku\u015fima\u2019dan Al\u0131nan Dersler Entegre Edilmemi\u015f<\/h3>\n<p>Sismik ara\u015ft\u0131rmalar, sel ve tsunami gibi etkilerin ise in\u015faat lisans\u0131 ile birlikte de\u011ferlendirilecek olmas\u0131, Fuku\u015fima kazas\u0131ndan sonra al\u0131nan derslerin Akkuyu \u00c7ED raporuna yeterince entegre edilmedi\u011finin bir g\u00f6stergesi.<\/p>\n<h3>At\u0131klar \u0130le \u0130lgili Olan B\u00f6l\u00fcm Gizlili\u011fini Koruyor<\/h3>\n<p>At\u0131klar\u0131n Bo\u011fazlar yoluyla Rusya\u2019ya g\u00f6nderilmesi durumunda olu\u015fabilecek riskler raporda belirtilmiyor. At\u0131klar\u0131n T\u00fcrkiye\u2019de depolanmas\u0131 durumunda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015f\u0131labilecek riskler ve bunlara dair \u00f6nlemlere ise yer verilmiyor. \u00c7ED\u2019de defalarca gerekti\u011fi takdirde at\u0131klar\u0131n burada depolanaca\u011f\u0131 kapasitenin oldu\u011fu belirtiliyor. TAEK\u2019in etkisizle\u015ftirildi\u011fi bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te, nas\u0131l bir denetim mekanizmas\u0131 i\u015fletilece\u011fi a\u00e7\u0131k de\u011fil.<\/p>\n<p>Greenpeace\u2019in nukleer.greenpeace.org adresi \u00fczerinden y\u00fcr\u00fctt\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ve \u00c7ED\u2019in onaylanmamas\u0131n\u0131 talep eden kampanyaya bug\u00fcne dek 200 bine yak\u0131n insan imzalar\u0131yla destek verdi<\/p>\n<p>Kaynak: Enerji Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.Akkuyu\u2019da kurulmas\u0131 planlanan n\u00fckleer santralin, \u00c7evre ve \u015eehircilik Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131\u2019na 3. Kez sunulan \u00c7ED raporunu de\u011ferlendiren Greenpeace, projeyle ilgili hala eksik pek \u00e7ok noktan\u0131n [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":29029,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[53,43],"tags":[16446,3768,2199,8055,16447,1401,3338,2644,2026],"views":780,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29028"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=29028"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29028\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29030,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/29028\/revisions\/29030"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/29029"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=29028"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=29028"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=29028"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}