{"id":1869,"date":"2012-09-07T09:35:55","date_gmt":"2012-09-07T06:35:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=1869"},"modified":"2012-09-07T09:36:28","modified_gmt":"2012-09-07T06:36:28","slug":"faturalarda-kayip-kacak-bedeli-yok","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/faturalarda-kayip-kacak-bedeli-yok\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Faturalarda kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli yok"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

Elektrik paras\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli \u00f6deyen abonelerden tahsil edilen kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli faturalarda gizlenmeye ba\u015flad\u0131.\u00a0<\/strong><\/span>\u00a0<\/p>\n

\"\"Elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleri, son aylarda abonelere g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi faturalarda ‘Kay\u0131p-Ka\u00e7ak Bedeli’ b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcndeki tutar k\u0131sm\u0131n\u0131 bo\u015f b\u0131rak\u0131yor. Uygulamayla aboneler, \u00f6dedi\u011fi ve daha \u00f6nce faturalarda g\u00f6rd\u00fc\u011f\u00fc ka\u00e7ak paras\u0131n\u0131 art\u0131k g\u00f6remiyor.
\n\u00a0
\nEnerji y\u00f6netiminden bir kaynak, tepkiler sebebiyle bedelin faturalarda g\u00f6sterilmedi\u011fini s\u00f6yledi. Bir abonenin a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava \u00fczerine mahkeme daha \u00f6nce tahsil edilen kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelinin iadesine karar vermi\u015fti. Ka\u00e7ak elektri\u011fin abonelere faturas\u0131 ge\u00e7en y\u0131l 3,33 milyar liray\u0131 bulurken, abonelerin bu paray\u0131 geri alabilmesi i\u00e7in tek tek dava a\u00e7malar\u0131 gerekiyor.<\/p>\n

G\u0130ZLEME S\u00d6Z KONUSU DE\u011e\u0130L
\n<\/strong>
\nZaman Gazetesin’den \u0130smail Altunsoy’un haberine g\u00f6re:<\/strong> Enerji y\u00f6netimi, 2011 y\u0131l\u0131n\u0131n ba\u015f\u0131ndan itibaren elektrik faturalar\u0131n\u0131n maliyet bazl\u0131 hesaplamalara g\u00f6re haz\u0131rlanmas\u0131na karar verdi. Bu \u00e7er\u00e7evede elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleri de faturalarda b\u00fct\u00fcn maliyet kalemlerine yer vermeye ba\u015flad\u0131. B\u00fct\u00fcn abonelerden kesilen ka\u00e7ak elektrik bedeli de, faturalarda ‘K.K BEDEL\u0130’ ibaresiyle g\u00f6sterilmeye ba\u015fland\u0131. Faturada kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 elektri\u011fin bedelini g\u00f6ren borcuna sad\u0131k aboneler, elektrik \u015firketlerine tepki g\u00f6stermeye ba\u015flad\u0131. Bu s\u00fcre\u00e7te ‘kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelinin faturalardan gizlenece\u011fi’ iddialar\u0131 g\u00fcndeme gelirken, Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakan\u0131 Taner Y\u0131ld\u0131z, vatanda\u015ftan herhangi bir gider kaleminin gizlenmesinin s\u00f6z konusu olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131klad\u0131.<\/p>\n

KARAR \u015e\u0130RKETLER\u0130N<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ancak da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleriyle bir araya gelen enerji y\u00f6netimi, faturalarda kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeline yer verilip verilmeyece\u011fini \u015firketlerin karar\u0131na b\u0131rakt\u0131. \u015eirketlere ‘kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelinin ayr\u0131 yaz\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n tepkilere sebep oldu\u011fu’ hat\u0131rlatmas\u0131 yap\u0131ld\u0131. Bunun \u00fczerine \u015firketler de son aylarda abonelere g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi elektrik faturalar\u0131nda kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeline yer vermemeye ba\u015flad\u0131. \u015eirketler ka\u00e7a\u011f\u0131n paras\u0131n\u0131 faturadaki di\u011fer kalemlere eklemeyi tercih etti. B\u00f6ylece abonelerin, kullanmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ‘ka\u00e7ak elektri\u011fin’ bedelini faturalarda g\u00f6rme imk\u00e2n\u0131 ortadan kalkm\u0131\u015f oldu. Da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleri ise konuyla ilgili herhangi bir bilgilendirme yapmad\u0131.<\/p>\n

Enerji y\u00f6netiminden bir kaynak, elektrik faturalar\u0131nda kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak paras\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fclmesi \u00fczerine abonelerden b\u00fcy\u00fck bir tepki al\u0131nmaya ba\u015fland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 kaydetti. Kayna\u011fa g\u00f6re, daha \u00f6nceden de var olan bir uygulaman\u0131n ayr\u0131nt\u0131l\u0131 faturayla g\u00f6r\u00fclmeye ba\u015flanmas\u0131, abonelerde \u00e7al\u0131nan elektri\u011fin paras\u0131n\u0131 haks\u0131z yere \u00f6dedi\u011fi d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcncesine yol a\u00e7t\u0131.<\/p>\n

Manisa Milletvekili Erkan Ak\u00e7ay’\u0131n TBMM’de verdi\u011fi “2011’de kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak sebebiyle t\u00fcketicilerden fazladan yap\u0131lan tahsilat miktar\u0131” konusundaki soru \u00f6nergesini Enerji ve Tabii Kaynaklar Bakan\u0131 Taner Y\u0131ld\u0131z cevapland\u0131rm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Y\u0131ld\u0131z, “2011 y\u0131l\u0131nda elektrik tarifelerinin belirlenmesinde 3,33 milyar lira kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak maliyetinin dikkate al\u0131narak birim fiyat\u0131n belirlendi\u011fi” a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131n\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kaynak: Habera<\/a><\/p>\n

 <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.Elektrik paras\u0131n\u0131 d\u00fczenli \u00f6deyen abonelerden tahsil edilen kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli faturalarda gizlenmeye ba\u015flad\u0131.\u00a0\u00a0 Elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketleri, son aylarda abonelere g\u00f6nderdi\u011fi faturalarda ‘Kay\u0131p-Ka\u00e7ak Bedeli’ b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcndeki […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1870,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53],"tags":[497,499,498],"views":653,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1869"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1869"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1869\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1872,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1869\/revisions\/1872"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1870"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1869"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1869"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1869"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}