{"id":17742,"date":"2013-11-18T18:43:24","date_gmt":"2013-11-18T15:43:24","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=17742"},"modified":"2013-11-18T18:43:24","modified_gmt":"2013-11-18T15:43:24","slug":"turkiye-uluslararasi-tahkimdeki-enerji-davalarini-bir-bir-kazaniyor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/turkiye-uluslararasi-tahkimdeki-enerji-davalarini-bir-bir-kazaniyor\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) T\u00fcrkiye Uluslararas\u0131 Tahkimdeki Enerji Davalar\u0131n\u0131 Bir Bir Kazan\u0131yor…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

T\u00fcrkiye son y\u0131llarda bir yandan hayata ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi projeler ve mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fiklikleriyle enerji sekt\u00f6r\u00fcne ivme kazand\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken, di\u011fer yandan uluslararas\u0131 tahkim davalar\u0131nda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 performans sergiliyor.<\/strong><\/p>\n

Enerji sekt\u00f6r\u00fcn\u00fcn serbestle\u015fmesini ama\u00e7layan 4628 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanunun y\u00fcr\u00fcrl\u00fc\u011fe girmesinden \u00f6nce 3096 say\u0131l\u0131 Kanun kapsam\u0131nda imzalanan \u00fcretim ve da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m tesislerinin \u0130\u015fletme Hakk\u0131 Devri (\u0130HD) s\u00f6zle\u015fmelerinin b\u00fcy\u00fck bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc Dan\u0131\u015ftay taraf\u0131ndan iptal edilmi\u015fti. S\u00f6zle\u015fmesi imzalanm\u0131\u015f ancak hen\u00fcz in\u015faat\u0131na ba\u015flanmam\u0131\u015f Y\u0130D projelerinin de bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc serbest piyasa \u015fartlar\u0131na uymad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve Hazine garantisi verilmedi\u011fi i\u00e7in uygulanamam\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bu projelerden Atam Alapl\u0131 B.V. taraf\u0131ndan Uluslararas\u0131 Yat\u0131r\u0131m Uyu\u015fmazl\u0131klar\u0131 \u00c7\u00f6z\u00fcm Merkezi (ICSID) nezdinde a\u00e7\u0131lan tahkim davas\u0131nda \u015firket 100 milyon dolar tazminat talebinde bulunmu\u015f, esasa ve yetkiye ili\u015fkin duru\u015fmalar 10 Ocak-11 \u015eubat 2011<\/strong> tarihleri aras\u0131nda Paris\u2019te yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Hakem heyeti nihai karar\u0131n\u0131 16 Temmuz 2012 tarihinde vermi\u015f ve \u015firketin t\u00fcm talepleri reddetmi\u015fti. Ancak \u015firket taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu karar\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in 12 Kas\u0131m 2012\u2032de ICSID\u2019e yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvuru s\u00fcreci halen devam ediyor.<\/p>\n

Tazminat talep ederken ceza ald\u0131<\/h2>\n

\u0130HD ve Y\u0130D projeleri d\u0131\u015f\u0131nda s\u00f6zle\u015fmeye ayk\u0131r\u0131 davran\u0131\u015flar nedeniyle iptal edilen imtiyaz s\u00f6zle\u015fmeleri konusunda da ICSID nezdinde tahkim davalar\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Bunlardan \u00c7ukurova Elektrik A\u015e (\u00c7EA\u015e) ve Kepez Elektrik TA\u015e (KE\"\"<\/a>PEZ) \u015firketlerinden her birinin toplam sermayesinin yakla\u015f\u0131k y\u00fczde 66\u2032s\u0131na sahip oldu\u011funu iddia eden G\u00fcney K\u0131br\u0131s men\u015feli Libananco Holdings Co. Ltd. taraf\u0131ndan enerji \u015fart\u0131 anla\u015fmas\u0131 \u00e7er\u00e7evesinde T\u00fcrkiye aleyhine 10 milyar 100 milyon dolar tazminat talebiyle ICSID nezdinde dava a\u00e7\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Yetkiye ili\u015fkin duru\u015fma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f, hakem heyetinin karar\u0131yla davac\u0131 Libananco\u2019nun tazminat talebi reddedilmi\u015f ve davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan devlete toplam 15 milyon 602 bin 500 dolar \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmedilmi\u015fti. \u015eirketin 19 Aral\u0131k 2011 tarihinde hakem heyetinin 2 Eyl\u00fcl 2011 tarihli karar\u0131n\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in ICSID nezdinde a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131 dava da reddedilmi\u015f, hakem heyetinin 22 May\u0131s 2013 tarihli karar\u0131 Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n lehine sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u00c7EA\u015e\u2019\u0131n toplam sermayesinin y\u00fczde 12,24\u2032\u00fcn\u00fc, KEPEZ\u2019in toplam sermayesinin ise y\u00fczde 10,73\u2032\u00fcn\u00fc elinde bulundurdu\u011funu iddia eden Polonya men\u015feli Cementownia Nowa Huta taraf\u0131ndan T\u00fcrkiye aleyhine ICSID nezdinde a\u00e7\u0131lan tahkim davas\u0131 da T\u00fcrkiye lehine sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

A\u0130HM reddetti<\/h2>\n

Kemal Uzan, Rumeli Elektrik, \u00c7EA\u015e ve KEPEZ 22 May\u0131s 2003 tarihinde T\u00fcrkiye Cumhuriyeti H\u00fck\u00fcmeti aleyhine Avrupa \u0130nsan Haklar\u0131 Mahkemesi\u2019ne (A\u0130HM) ba\u015fvurmu\u015ftu. S\u00f6z konusu ba\u015fvurunun kabul edilebilirli\u011fine ve esas\u0131na ili\u015fkin olarak mahkemenin talebi \u00fczerine 30 Kas\u0131m 2010 tarihinde Strazburg\u2019da duru\u015fma yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015f ve T\u00fcrkiye ad\u0131na gerekli a\u00e7\u0131klamalar ve savunmalar yap\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Mahkeme 29 Mart 2011 tarihinde davac\u0131lar\u0131n ba\u015fvurular\u0131n\u0131n kabul edilemez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

\u00c7EA\u015e ve KEPEZ\u2019 in Borsa \u0130stanbul\u2019da (\u0130stanbul Menkul K\u0131ymetler Borsas\u0131nda) i\u015flem g\u00f6ren hisselerinin bir b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fcn sahibi olan ba\u015fvuranlar\u0131n (Erol Soyuer ve 46 ki\u015fi); bahse konu \u015firketlerin Borsa \u0130stanbul\u2019daki i\u015flemlerinin durdurulmas\u0131 sebebiyle maddi kayba u\u011frad\u0131klar\u0131n\u0131 ileri s\u00fcrerek yapt\u0131klar\u0131 ba\u015fvurularla ilgili A\u0130HM, 21 Haziran 2011\u2032de Erol Soyuer ve 46 ki\u015fi taraf\u0131ndan yap\u0131lan ba\u015fvurunun da kabul edilmez oldu\u011funa karar vermi\u015fti.<\/p>\n

ICC T\u00fcrkiye\u2019ye hak verdi<\/h2>\n

Tun\u00e7bilek Termik Santral\u0131 ve Sivas-Kangal Termik Santrali ile ilgili olarak Uluslararas\u0131 Ticaret Odas\u0131 (ICC) nezdinde a\u00e7\u0131lan davalar T\u00fcrkiye lehine sonu\u00e7lanm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Tun\u00e7bilek Termik Santrali\u2019ne ili\u015fkin hakem heyetinin nihai karar\u0131yla davac\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan devlete, dava s\u00fcrecinde yap\u0131lan avukatl\u0131k \u00fccretleri ve harcama tutarlar\u0131n\u0131n \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmedilmi\u015fti. \u015eirket taraf\u0131ndan s\u00f6z konusu \u00fccret ve harcama tutarlar\u0131 (910 bin 440 dolar ile 161 bin 813 lira) Bakanl\u0131\u011f\u0131n ilgili hesab\u0131na yat\u0131r\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131. Sivas-Kangal Termik Santrali\u2019ne ili\u015fkin ise hakem heyetinin nihai karar\u0131yla davac\u0131n\u0131n yapt\u0131\u011f\u0131 masraflara ili\u015fkin davac\u0131 \u015firkete 13 milyon dolar \u00f6denmesine h\u00fckmedilmi\u015f ve bu tutar \u015firketin ilgili hesab\u0131na aktar\u0131lm\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

Kaynak: Enerji Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.T\u00fcrkiye son y\u0131llarda bir yandan hayata ge\u00e7irdi\u011fi projeler ve mevzuat de\u011fi\u015fiklikleriyle enerji sekt\u00f6r\u00fcne ivme kazand\u0131rmaya \u00e7al\u0131\u015f\u0131rken, di\u011fer yandan uluslararas\u0131 tahkim davalar\u0131nda ba\u015far\u0131l\u0131 performans […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":12281,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[53],"tags":[10429,63,67,1009,165,665,10428,10426,5019,10430,10423,10432,10424,10431,10427,10425],"views":577,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17742"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17742"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17742\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17743,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17742\/revisions\/17743"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/12281"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17742"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17742"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17742"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}