{"id":17142,"date":"2013-11-03T19:12:55","date_gmt":"2013-11-03T16:12:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=17142"},"modified":"2013-11-03T19:12:55","modified_gmt":"2013-11-03T16:12:55","slug":"aboneye-kayip-kacak-mujdesi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/aboneye-kayip-kacak-mujdesi\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Aboneye “Kay\u0131p-Ka\u00e7ak” M\u00fcjdesi!"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

Ba\u015fak\u015fehir T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti, milyonlarca abonenin b\u00fcy\u00fck tepkisini \u00e7eken elektrikte ‘kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli’yle ilgili yeni bir karar ald\u0131.<\/strong><\/p>\n

T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti, EPDK’n\u0131n bir aboneye 60 TL’lik kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelini \u00f6demesini kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131. Karar emsal olu\u015fturursa abonelere 2 milyar TL tutar\u0131nda \u00f6deme g\u00fcndeme gelecek.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fak\u015fehir T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti, milyonlarca abonenin b\u00fcy\u00fck tepkisini \u00e7eken elektrikte ‘kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli’yle ilgili yeni bir karar ald\u0131. Heyet, Enerji Piyasas\u0131 D\u00fczenleme Kurumu’nun (EPDK) bir aboneye, 60 TL kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli \u00f6demesini kararla\u015ft\u0131rd\u0131.<\/p>\n

\u0130stanbul’da ya\u015fayan bir vatanda\u015f, elektrik faturas\u0131 \u00fczerinden tahsil edilen kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7akla ilgili olarak Ba\u015fak\u015fehir T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti’ne hizmet ald\u0131\u011f\u0131 da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketi aleyhine ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131. Heyet, da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketinin EPDK’n\u0131n mevzuat\u0131n\u0131 uygulad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirterek talebi reddetti.\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Abone, bu karar \u00fczerine yeni bir ba\u015fvuru yapt\u0131. Bu kez, EPDK’y\u0131 ve Kurum’un mevzuat\u0131n\u0131, \u015fikayetine ve istemine gerek\u00e7e g\u00f6sterdi. Hakem heyeti, talebi ve iddialar\u0131 inceledi.<\/p>\n

Heyet, EPDK’ya, ‘mevzuat\u0131 sen \u00e7\u0131kard\u0131n. Vatanda\u015fa, \u015fikayete konu faturadaki kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelini \u00f6de’ y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kritik bir karar ald\u0131.<\/p>\n

Bu karar, elektrikte kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak uygulamas\u0131nda bir ilk olarak yerini ald\u0131. Hakem heyetlerinden daha \u00f6nce elektrik da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m \u015firketlerinin kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelini \u00f6demesi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde kararlar \u00e7\u0131km\u0131\u015ft\u0131.<\/p>\n

EPDK, T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti’nin i\u015faret etti\u011fi bi\u00e7imde \u015fikayet\u00e7i aboneye 60 TL’lik (\u015fikayete konu faturadaki) kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedelini \u00f6dedi. EPDK, zaman yitirmeden yarg\u0131 s\u00fcrecini i\u015fletti. Karar\u0131n iptali istemiyle ‘Bak\u0131rk\u00f6y T\u00fcketici Mahkemesi’nde dava a\u00e7t\u0131. EPDK ve sekt\u00f6rde b\u00fcy\u00fck yank\u0131 uyand\u0131ran karar\u0131n davas\u0131, \u015fubat ay\u0131nda g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fclecek.<\/p>\n

Ba\u015fak\u015fehir T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti karar\u0131n\u0131n ’emsal’ olu\u015fturmas\u0131 halinde EPDK’n\u0131n 34 milyon elektrik abonesine ayr\u0131 ayr\u0131 kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli \u00f6demesi g\u00fcndeme gelebilir. Kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli tutarlar\u0131 aboneye g\u00f6re de\u011fi\u015fiyor. Her bir aboneye ortalama 50-55 TL \u00f6denmesi halinde \u00f6denecek tutar 2 milyar TL’ye yakla\u015f\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Kaynak: Energy World<\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.Ba\u015fak\u015fehir T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti, milyonlarca abonenin b\u00fcy\u00fck tepkisini \u00e7eken elektrikte ‘kay\u0131p-ka\u00e7ak bedeli’yle ilgili yeni bir karar ald\u0131. T\u00fcketici Hakem Heyeti, EPDK’n\u0131n bir aboneye […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":7160,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53],"tags":[5144,10075,68,61,63,67,1009,1046,165,750,1083,10074],"views":761,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17142"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17142"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17142\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":17143,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17142\/revisions\/17143"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7160"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17142"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17142"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17142"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}