{"id":124715,"date":"2020-12-07T14:33:21","date_gmt":"2020-12-07T11:33:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=124715"},"modified":"2020-12-07T14:52:31","modified_gmt":"2020-12-07T11:52:31","slug":"hicbir-ulke-yeterince-iyi-degil-turkiye-zayif-ab-ise-yol-ayriminda","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/hicbir-ulke-yeterince-iyi-degil-turkiye-zayif-ab-ise-yol-ayriminda\/","title":{"rendered":"(Turkish) Hi\u00e7bir \u00dclke Yeterince \u0130yi De\u011fil, T\u00fcrkiye Zay\u0131f, AB ise Yol Ayr\u0131m\u0131nda…"},"content":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish<\/a>. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language.<\/p>

<\/p>\n

Yay\u0131mlanan Endeks, en y\u00fcksek emisyona sahip 57 \u00fclke ve AB\u2019nin iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi konusundaki performanslar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiriyor.<\/strong><\/h1>\n

– Ankette yer alan \u00fclkelerin hi\u00e7biri, Paris Anla\u015fmas\u0131 hedefleri<\/strong>yle uyumlu bir yol izlemiyor.
\n– Analize dahil edilen \u00fclkelerin yar\u0131s\u0131ndan fazlas\u0131n\u0131n emisyonlar\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f<\/strong> ya\u015fan\u0131yor.
\n\"\"– AB \u00fclkelerinin 7<\/strong> tanesi ve AB i\u00e7erisinde yer alan \u00fclkeler bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011finde, iklimin korunmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131nda “y\u00fcksek”<\/strong> not al\u0131yor. Ancak AB<\/strong> i\u00e7erisindeki 5 \u00fclke “\u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck” performans<\/strong> g\u00f6steren kategoride yer al\u0131yor.
\n– Portekiz<\/strong> ve Yeni Zelanda<\/strong> en h\u0131zl\u0131 y\u00fckseli\u015fi kaydederken \u0130sve\u00e7<\/strong> listenin ba\u015f\u0131nda yer al\u0131yor.
\n– ABD<\/strong> \u00fcst \u00fcste 2’inci<\/strong> kez Suudi Arabistan<\/strong>‘dan d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck not al\u0131yor ve s\u0131ralaman\u0131n sonunda yer al\u0131yor.
\n– T\u00fcrkiye iklim politikas\u0131<\/strong> olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen yenilenebilir enerjideki geli\u015fmeler<\/strong> nedeniyle 42’inci s\u0131raya<\/strong> y\u00fckseldi.<\/p>\n

Berlin, 7 Aral\u0131k 2020<\/em>: Bug\u00fcn yay\u0131nlanan \u0130klim De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi Performans Endeksi 2021 (Climate Change Performance Index, CCPI)<\/em><\/a>, Avrupa Birli\u011fi’nin iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle m\u00fccadele<\/strong> kapsam\u0131ndaki ilerleyi\u015fin \u00fclkeler aras\u0131nda homojen \u015fekilde ger\u00e7ekle\u015fmedi\u011fini g\u00f6steriyor. \u0130skandinav \u00fclkeleri, Portekiz<\/strong> ve bir b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirilen AB blo\u011funun<\/strong> performans\u0131, di\u011fer \u00fclkelerle k\u0131yasland\u0131\u011f\u0131nda, \u00fcst s\u0131ralarda yer al\u0131yor. Ancak Macaristan, Polonya<\/strong> ve \u00c7ek Cumhuriyeti, Avrupa Birli\u011fi<\/strong> i\u00e7erisinde iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle m\u00fccadelede<\/strong> ya\u015fanan ilerlemenin aksi y\u00f6n\u00fcnde ilerliyor.<\/p>\n

Genel s\u0131ralamada AB<\/strong>, daha etkin iklim politikalar\u0131<\/strong> sayesinde ge\u00e7en y\u0131l bulundu\u011fu 22’nci<\/strong> s\u0131radan bu y\u0131l 16’nc\u0131<\/strong> s\u0131raya y\u00fckseldi.<\/p>\n

Endeks, k\u00fcresel \u00f6l\u00e7ekte emisyonlar\u0131n % 90’\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan 57 \u00fclkeyi inceliyor<\/strong><\/h2>\n

Endeks, k\u00fcresel \u00f6l\u00e7ekte emisyonlar\u0131n % 90<\/strong>‘\u0131n\u0131 olu\u015fturan 57<\/strong> \u00fclkenin (ve AB\u2019nin b\u00fct\u00fcn olarak de\u011ferlendirildi\u011fi durumda) iklimi koruma y\u00f6n\u00fcndeki performans\u0131<\/strong>n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiriyor ve \u00fclkeler aras\u0131nda kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131rmalar sunuyor. CCPI<\/strong>\u2019n\u0131n 2021 versiyonu, koronavir\u00fcs krizi<\/strong> \u00f6ncesinde atmosfere yay\u0131lan emisyonlar\u0131 analiz etti\u011fi i\u00e7in krizin tetikledi\u011fi ola\u011fand\u0131\u015f\u0131 emisyon azalt\u0131m\u0131n\u0131<\/strong> yans\u0131tm\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

Endeks, Germanwatch<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan NewClimate Institute<\/strong> ve \u0130klim Eylem A\u011f\u0131 <\/strong>(Climate Action Network, CAN)<\/strong><\/em> kurumlar\u0131n\u0131n katk\u0131s\u0131yla haz\u0131rland\u0131. Germanwatch\u2019da \u00e7al\u0131\u015fan ve CCPI\u2019n\u0131n yazarlar\u0131 aras\u0131nda yer alan Jan Burck<\/strong>, “G\u00fcncel \u0130klim De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi Performans Endeksi, AB’nin d\u00f6n\u00fcm noktas\u0131nda bulundu\u011funu g\u00f6zler \u00f6n\u00fcne seriyor”<\/em> diyor.<\/p>\n

T\u00fcrkiye 42’inci s\u0131rada<\/h2>\n

T\u00fcrkiye ise bu y\u0131lki \u0130klim De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi Performans Endeksi (Climate Change Performance Index) CCPI<\/em> s\u0131ralamas\u0131nda 42’inci s\u0131rada<\/strong> yer al\u0131yor. Muazzam yenilenebilir enerji potansiyeli<\/strong> ve mevcut trendler<\/strong> sayesinde, \u00fclkenin hi\u00e7bir iklim politikas\u0131<\/strong> veya hedefi<\/strong> olmamas\u0131na ra\u011fmen T\u00fcrkiye bir \u00f6nceki y\u0131la g\u00f6re s\u0131ralamas\u0131n\u0131 biraz iyile\u015ftirdi ve alt\u0131 s\u0131ra y\u00fckseldi. Sera Gaz\u0131 Emisyonlar\u0131<\/strong> ve Enerji Kullan\u0131m\u0131 <\/strong>kategorilerindeki \u201czay\u0131f\u201d<\/strong> puan\u0131 ve iklim uzmanlar\u0131 taraf\u0131ndan \u0130klim Politikas\u0131<\/strong> performans\u0131 i\u00e7in verilen \u201c\u00e7ok zay\u0131f\u201d<\/strong> puan\u0131 ile T\u00fcrkiye\u2019nin zay\u0131f y\u00f6nleri bir \u00f6nceki y\u0131lla benzerlik g\u00f6steriyor. Bu benzerlik, Yenilenebilir Enerji kategorisi<\/strong>ndeki y\u00fcksek puanl\u0131 performans\u0131 i\u00e7in de ge\u00e7erli. Ancak uzmanlar, yenilenebilir enerji<\/strong> alan\u0131ndaki olumlu gidi\u015fat\u0131n b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde hidroelektrik santrallerden<\/strong> kaynakland\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirtiyor.<\/p>\n

Avrupa \u0130klim Eylem A\u011f\u0131 (CAN Europe) T\u00fcrkiye \u0130klim ve Enerji Politikalar\u0131 Koordinat\u00f6r\u00fc \u00d6zlem Kat\u0131s\u00f6z:<\/strong> \u201cT\u00fcrkiye\u2019yi, art\u0131k Paris Anla\u015fmas\u0131\u2019n\u0131 onaylamaya ve mevcut halinde 2030\u2019a kadar iki kat art\u0131\u015f \u00f6ng\u00f6ren emisyon azalt\u0131m hedefini (INDC) revize etmeye \u00e7a\u011f\u0131r\u0131yoruz. Karar vericiler, iklim eyleminin topluma ve ekonomiye sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131 faydalar\u0131 kabul edip kesin bir k\u00f6m\u00fcrden \u00e7\u0131k\u0131\u015f taahh\u00fcd\u00fc i\u00e7eren, enerji verimlili\u011fini art\u0131ran ve yenilenebilir enerjiye dayal\u0131 bir gelecek in\u015fa eden etkili bir enerji d\u00f6n\u00fc\u015f\u00fcm\u00fc stratejisi geli\u015ftirmeli. T\u00fcrkiye, g\u00fcne\u015f ve r\u00fczg\u00e2rdan elektrik \u00fcretiminin iletim-da\u011f\u0131t\u0131m sistemine ek yat\u0131r\u0131m yapmadan kolayca ikiye katlanabilece\u011fi, k\u00fc\u00e7\u00fck bir yat\u0131r\u0131mla ise \u00fc\u00e7 kat\u0131na \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131labilece\u011fi b\u00fcy\u00fck bir potansiyele sahip. Buna kar\u015f\u0131n, k\u00f6m\u00fcr hala ulusal enerji politikas\u0131n\u0131n merkezinde duruyor\u201d<\/em> dedi.<\/p>\n

Rapor, 2030 iklim hedefleri<\/strong>ni konu alan AB zirvesi, BM\u2019nin iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle m\u00fccadelede<\/strong> daha azimli ad\u0131mlar at\u0131lmas\u0131 amac\u0131yla yap\u0131lan UN Climate Ambition Summit ve 12 Aral\u0131k’ta be\u015finci y\u0131l d\u00f6n\u00fcm\u00fc olan Paris Anla\u015fmas\u0131’n\u0131n birka\u00e7 g\u00fcn \u00f6ncesinde yay\u0131nland\u0131.<\/p>\n

Burck “AB<\/strong>, k\u00fcresel \u0131s\u0131nmay\u0131 1,5\u00b0C<\/strong> ile s\u0131n\u0131rlama hedefiyle uyumlu \u015fekilde 2030<\/strong> i\u00e7in iddial\u0131 bir iklim hedefi belirleyerek ve Ye\u015fil Mutabakat<\/strong>\u2019\u0131n etkin \u015fekilde uygulanmas\u0131n\u0131 ve geli\u015ftirilmesini sa\u011flayarak, koronavir\u00fcs krizi<\/strong> sonras\u0131nda verilen ye\u015fil kurtarma \u00f6nlemleri<\/strong> uyar\u0131nca k\u00fcresel iklimin korunmas\u0131<\/strong>nda bir rol model olabilir. Ancak, ye\u015fil toparlanma<\/strong> yerine \u2018ye\u015fil g\u00f6z boyama\u2019<\/strong> (greenwashing) yoluna gitti\u011fi ve Ye\u015fil Mutabakat\u2019<\/strong>\u0131n hedef ve ara\u00e7lar\u0131n\u0131 yetersiz \u015fekilde uygulamaya koydu\u011fu durumda, k\u00f6t\u00fc bir \u015fekilde t\u00f6kezleyebilir”<\/em> diyor.<\/p>\n

Alt\u0131 G20 \u00fclkesi listenin en alt s\u0131ralar\u0131nda yer al\u0131yor. G20 \u00fclkelerinin yaln\u0131zca \u00fc\u00e7 tanesi liderlik g\u00f6steriyor<\/strong><\/h2>\n

G20 \u00fclkelerinin performanslar\u0131 b\u00fct\u00fcnc\u00fcl<\/strong> bir resim \u00e7izmiyor. Endekste y\u00fcksek puan alan G20 \u00fclkeleri<\/strong> aras\u0131nda \u0130ngiltere (5.), Hindistan (10.) ve AB yer al\u0131yor. Bunun yan\u0131 s\u0131ra G20 \u00fclkelerinin b\u00fcy\u00fck b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fc Endeksin alt s\u0131ralar\u0131nda yer al\u0131yor. ABD (61.), Suudi Arabistan (60.), Kanada (58.), Avustralya (54.), G\u00fcney Kore (53.), ve Rusya (52.) s\u0131rada<\/em> yer al\u0131yor ve bu \u00fclkelerin performanslar\u0131 “\u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck” kategorisinde de\u011ferlendiriliyor. T\u00fcrkiye ise 42’inci s\u0131rada ve \u201cd\u00fc\u015f\u00fck\u201d performansl\u0131 olarak listelendi.<\/strong><\/p>\n

K\u00fcresel emisyonlarda<\/strong> sistematik bir d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f potansiyeli\u00a0ula\u015f\u0131labilir g\u00f6r\u00fcl\u00fcyor. Ancak Paris Anla\u015fmas\u0131’n\u0131n<\/strong> imzalanmas\u0131n\u0131n \u00fczerinden ge\u00e7en 5 y\u0131l\u0131n<\/strong> ard\u0131ndan hi\u00e7bir \u00fclkenin bu anla\u015fman\u0131n hedefleriyle uyumlu bir yolda olmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 belirleniyor. Genel olarak, sera gaz\u0131 emisyonlar\u0131<\/strong>nda bir miktar art\u0131\u015f g\u00f6zleniyor. Ancak de\u011ferlendirmede yer alan \u00fclkelerin yar\u0131s\u0131ndan fazlas\u0131nda (32 tanesinde) emisyonlar d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcyor. \u00dclkelerin \u00fc\u00e7te ikisinde (38 tanesinde), ihtiya\u00e7 duyulan toplam birincil enerjinin y\u00fczde onundan fazlas\u0131 yenilenebilir kaynaklardan kar\u015f\u0131lan\u0131yor. On iki tane \u00fclkenin birincil enerji \u00fcretiminin %20<\/strong>\u2019sinden fazlas\u0131 yenilenebilir kaynaklardan kar\u015f\u0131lan\u0131yor.<\/p>\n

NewClimate Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc’n\u00fcn kurucular\u0131ndan olan Prof. Dr. Niklas H\u00f6hne<\/strong> “D\u00fcnya \u00e7ap\u0131ndaki ekonomik toparlanman\u0131n ekonomileri canland\u0131rmay\u0131 desteklemenin yan\u0131 s\u0131ra s\u0131f\u0131r karbonlu k\u00fcresel bir sisteme haz\u0131rlamas\u0131<\/strong> g\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde b\u00fcy\u00fck \u00f6nem ta\u015f\u0131yor. Endeks\u2019te belirlenen kurtarma paketlerinin sera gaz\u0131 emisyonlar\u0131nda<\/strong> azalma ya da art\u0131\u015fla sonu\u00e7lanaca\u011f\u0131 belirsizli\u011fini koruyor. Ancak kurtarma paketlerini \u015fekillendirmek i\u00e7in hala olanaklar var ve bir\u00e7ok etkin \u00f6nlemin paketlerde yer almas\u0131 hala tart\u0131\u015f\u0131l\u0131yor\u201d<\/em> diyor.<\/p>\n

\u0130spanya, Bel\u00e7ika ve Yunanistan\u2019\u0131n iklim performans\u0131nda d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f ya\u015fan\u0131yor<\/strong><\/h2>\n

\u0130sve\u00e7<\/strong>\u00a0(4. s\u0131rada, “y\u00fcksek” kategoride) \u00fcst \u00fcste 4’\u00fcnc\u00fc kez<\/strong> iklimin korunmas\u0131 kapsam\u0131ndaki uluslararas\u0131 liderli\u011fini koruyor. Ancak \u0130sve\u00e7<\/strong>\u2019in de iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle m\u00fccadele<\/strong>de bir “rol model” oldu\u011funu ileri s\u00fcrmek m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fil. G\u00fcn\u00fcm\u00fczde \u0130sve\u00e7<\/strong> de di\u011fer \u00fclkelerde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fc gibi Paris Anla\u015fmas\u0131’n\u0131n hedefleriyle uyumlu bir yolda ilerlemiyor. CCPI<\/strong>‘nin ilk \u00fc\u00e7<\/strong> s\u0131ras\u0131n\u0131n bo\u015f b\u0131rak\u0131lmas\u0131n\u0131n nedeni budur. Di\u011fer yandan \u0130sve\u00e7, sera gaz\u0131 emisyonlar\u0131, yenilenebilir enerji ve iklim politikalar\u0131 standartlar\u0131 belirliyor ve her bir kategoride en iyi performans g\u00f6steren kategoride yer al\u0131yor. \u0130sve\u00e7\u2019in ki\u015fi ba\u015f\u0131na d\u00fc\u015fen enerji t\u00fcketiminin \u00e7ok y\u00fcksek olmas\u0131 (49. s\u0131rada), de\u011ferlendirmede daha y\u00fcksek bir s\u0131ray\u0131 almas\u0131n\u0131 engelliyor. Genel s\u0131ralamada \u0130sve\u00e7\u2019i\u00a0\u0130ngiltere<\/strong>\u00a0(5.) ve\u00a0Danimarka<\/strong>\u00a0(6.) takip ediyor.<\/p>\n

25.<\/strong> s\u0131radan 17.<\/strong> s\u0131raya y\u00fckselen\u00a0Portekiz<\/strong>\u00a0ve listenin 37.\u2019ci<\/strong> s\u0131ras\u0131ndan 28\u2019e<\/strong> y\u00fckselen\u00a0Yeni Zelanda<\/strong>\u00a0en h\u0131zl\u0131 y\u00fckselen \u00fclkeler olarak g\u00f6steriliyor.\u00a0Japonya<\/strong>\u00a0da 51. s\u0131radan 45. s\u0131raya t\u0131rmanarak alt\u0131 s\u0131ra y\u00fckseliyor, ancak “d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck” kategoride not al\u0131yor (Japonya ge\u00e7ti\u011fimiz y\u0131l “\u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck” kategorisinde yer al\u0131yordu). \u00d6te yandan,\u00a0Slovenya<\/strong>\u00a0(44.’den 51.’e),\u00a0\u0130spanya<\/strong>\u00a0(34’ten 41’e),\u00a0Bel\u00e7ika<\/strong>\u00a0(35’ten 40’a) ve\u00a0Yunanistan<\/strong>\u00a0(28’den 34’e) performans\u0131nda en fazla d\u00fc\u015f\u00fc\u015f g\u00f6r\u00fclen \u00fclkeler oluyor.<\/p>\n

Fas, \u015eili ve Hindistan: \u0130lk 10 \u00fclke aras\u0131nda geli\u015fmekte olan \u00fc\u00e7 \u00fclke bulunuyor<\/strong><\/h2>\n

\u00dc\u00e7 adet<\/strong> geli\u015fmekte olan \u00fclke s\u0131ralamada ilk onda yer al\u0131yor. Bu \u00fclkeler 7. s\u0131radaki\u00a0Fas<\/strong>, 9. S\u0131radaki\u00a0\u015eili\u00a0<\/strong>ve 10. s\u0131radaki Hindistan<\/strong>. \u0130klim Eylem A\u011f\u2019n\u0131n <\/strong>(Climate Action Network, CAN)<\/strong><\/em> K\u00fcresel Enerji Politikalar\u0131 K\u0131demli Dan\u0131\u015fman\u0131 Stephan Singer<\/strong> “K\u00fcresel n\u00fcfusun %10’undan daha az b\u00f6l\u00fcm\u00fcn\u00fc bar\u0131nd\u0131ran ve fosil yak\u0131t ihra\u00e7 eden ve \u00fcreten \u00fclkelerin ba\u015f\u0131nda yer alan Amerika Birle\u015fik Devletleri, Rusya, Suudi Arabistan ve Avustralya s\u0131ralaman\u0131n sonunda yer al\u0131yor. Bu \u00fclkeler ayn\u0131 zamanda karbon kirlili\u011fi ve enerji t\u00fcketimi en y\u00fcksek \u00fclkeler olarak \u00f6ne \u00e7\u0131k\u0131yor. Bu \u00fclkelerin hi\u00e7birinin, karbon kirlili\u011fini azaltmaya y\u00f6nelik ulusal \u00f6l\u00e7ekte herhangi bir iklim politikas\u0131 bulunmuyor. Bu durum, belirtilen \u00fclkelerdeki fosil yak\u0131t end\u00fcstrilerinin etkinli\u011fini g\u00f6zler \u00f6n\u00fcne seriyor. \u00d6te yandan Portekiz, Fas, \u015eili ve Avrupa’da yer alan bir\u00e7ok \u00fclkenin daha etkin performans g\u00f6sterdi\u011fini g\u00f6r\u00fcyoruz. Sivil toplum olarak, iklim kriziyle etkin \u015fekilde m\u00fccadele etmek ad\u0131na, d\u00fcnya \u00e7ap\u0131nda fosil yak\u0131t \u015firketlerinin i\u015f modelini ge\u00e7ersiz k\u0131lmam\u0131z gerekiyor\u2019\u2019<\/em> diyor.<\/p>\n

ABD, Suudi Arabistan ve \u0130ran: En d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck performans g\u00f6steren \u00fclkeler<\/strong><\/h2>\n

ABD’nin performans\u0131 bu y\u0131l da felaket \u015feklinde nitelendiriliyor. Trump y\u00f6netimi<\/strong>nin son y\u0131l\u0131nda ABD\u2019nin performans\u0131 bir kez daha Suudi Arabistan’\u0131n<\/strong> alt\u0131nda seyrediyor. ABD “d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck”<\/strong> olarak nitelendirilen yenilenebilir enerji kategorisi<\/strong> d\u0131\u015f\u0131ndaki d\u00f6rt kategorinin<\/strong> tamam\u0131nda, tablonun en alt\u0131nda ve “\u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck” kategorisi<\/strong>nde yer al\u0131yor. ABD ayn\u0131 zamanda\u00a0Avustralya\u00a0<\/strong>ve\u00a0Cezayir<\/strong>\u00a0ile birlikte ulusal<\/strong> ve uluslararas\u0131 iklim politikalar\u0131<\/strong> kategorisinde “\u00e7ok d\u00fc\u015f\u00fck”<\/strong> notu al\u0131yor. Ba\u015fkanl\u0131k se\u00e7imini kazanan Biden’in planlar\u0131, se\u00e7im kampanyas\u0131ndaki vaatlerin hayata ge\u00e7irilmesi durumunda, bu de\u011ferlendirmenin \u00f6nemli \u00f6l\u00e7\u00fcde iyile\u015ftirilmesi ad\u0131na \u00f6nemli bir f\u0131rsat sunuyor. Senato’daki \u00e7o\u011funlu\u011fun belirsizli\u011fini korumas\u0131 sebebiyle se\u00e7im vaatlerinin ne kadar\u0131n\u0131n uygulamaya ge\u00e7ece\u011fi ise bilinmiyor.<\/p>\n

Germanwatch ve NewClimate Institute (Almanya) taraf\u0131ndan geli\u015ftirilen\u00a0\u0130klim De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi Performans Endeksi<\/strong> Bilgilendirmesi<\/p>\n

Germanwatch<\/strong> ve NewClimate Enstit\u00fcs\u00fc<\/strong> taraf\u0131ndan Uluslararas\u0131 \u0130klim Eylem A\u011f\u0131 (Climate Action Network, CAN International)<\/strong> ile i\u015fbirli\u011fi i\u00e7erisinde yay\u0131nlanan \u0130klim De\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi Performans Endeksi, k\u00fcresel \u00f6l\u00e7ekte atmosfere yay\u0131lan sera gaz\u0131 emisyonlar\u0131<\/strong>n\u0131n yakla\u015f\u0131k %90<\/strong>‘\u0131ndan sorumlu olan 57 \u00fclke<\/strong>nin ve AB’nin iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fiyle m\u00fccadele<\/strong> kapsam\u0131ndaki performans\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiriyor. De\u011ferlendirme d\u00f6rt kategoride<\/strong> ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftiriliyor: Sera Gaz\u0131 Emisyonlar\u0131<\/strong> (%40), Yenilenebilir Enerji<\/strong> (%20), Enerji Kullan\u0131m\u0131<\/strong> (%20) ve \u0130klim Politikalar\u0131<\/strong> (%20). \u0130klim politikalar\u0131 kategorisinin de\u011ferlendirilmesi, bu \u00fclkelerdeki STK’lar ve d\u00fc\u015f\u00fcnce kurulu\u015flar\u0131n\u0131n uzman g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015flerine dayan\u0131yor. CCPI;<\/strong> Emisyonlar, Yenilenebilir Enerji<\/strong> ve Enerji Kullan\u0131m\u0131 kategorileri<\/strong> kapsam\u0131nda, belirtilen \u00fclkelerin k\u00fcresel \u0131s\u0131nmay\u0131 2\u00b0C<\/strong> ile s\u0131n\u0131rland\u0131rma hedefi olan Paris Anla\u015fmas\u0131<\/strong> hedefleriyle uyumlu olma ad\u0131na yeterli ad\u0131mlar\u0131n at\u0131l\u0131p at\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 da de\u011ferlendiriyor. Bu nedenle CCPI,<\/strong> uluslararas\u0131 iklim politikalar\u0131nda \u015feffafl\u0131\u011f\u0131n art\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131 ad\u0131na \u00f6nemli bir rol \u00fcstleniyor. CCPI, iklimin korunmas\u0131 \u00e7abalar\u0131<\/strong> kapsam\u0131nda \u00fclkeler taraf\u0131ndan ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirilen ilerlemelerin birbiriyle kar\u015f\u0131la\u015ft\u0131r\u0131lmas\u0131na da imkan sa\u011fl\u0131yor. Endeks 2005 y\u0131l\u0131ndan<\/strong> bu yana her y\u0131l yay\u0131nlan\u0131yor.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Sorry, this entry is only available in Turkish. For the sake of viewer convenience, the content is shown below in the alternative language. You may click the link to switch the active language. Yay\u0131mlanan Endeks, en y\u00fcksek emisyona sahip 57 \u00fclke ve AB\u2019nin iklim de\u011fi\u015fikli\u011fi konusundaki performanslar\u0131n\u0131 de\u011ferlendiriyor. – Ankette yer alan \u00fclkelerin hi\u00e7biri, Paris […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":124717,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53,52],"tags":[1192,83193,39624,83196,62326,52259,25782,41159,4531,83195,83192,10921,6333,4578,2533,46773,57125,83194],"views":86,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124715"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=124715"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/124715\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/124717"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=124715"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=124715"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=124715"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}