{"id":117649,"date":"2020-07-27T12:37:17","date_gmt":"2020-07-27T09:37:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=117649"},"modified":"2020-07-27T12:39:32","modified_gmt":"2020-07-27T09:39:32","slug":"avrupa-neden-kuresel-yesil-donusume-liderlik-etmelidir","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/avrupa-neden-kuresel-yesil-donusume-liderlik-etmelidir\/","title":{"rendered":"Why Europe Must Lead a Global Green Recovery"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/p>\n

As governments spend massively to revive economies, a huge battle has emerged around whether the economic recovery should also achieve other goals, particularly cutting the emissions that cause climate change. Those advocating green spending say the $10 trillion that governments have\u00a0already committed\u00a0to stimulus\u00a0should be just the beginning, and an even bigger pile of cash is now needed for expansive \u201cgreen new deals.\u201d<\/h1>\n

In most countries, the political forces are\u00a0blowing against green recovery<\/strong>. Distant, abstract goals like global warming have fallen far down the list of priorities while paychecks and health loom much larger than they did six months ago. Some have actually\u00a0relaxed pollution control standards<\/strong>\u00a0and \"\"will take growth at any cost. While there are many policies that could deliver economic growth and lower emissions,\u00a0most of them don\u2019t work quickly\u00a0<\/strong>\u2014 and thus don\u2019t deliver what most citizens expect from government today. With global markets and societies in chaos, our\u00a0ability to forecast has gone down<\/strong>; risks for investors in long-lived technologies, which is most of what\u2019s needed for deep decarbonization, have gone up. Unlike the last financial crisis, when nations spent up to 15 percent of their stimulus money on clean energy, few have such forward-looking plans this time.<\/p>\n

Europe, however, is the exception. There, the\u00a0European Green Deal\u00a0<\/strong>\u2014 a $1.1 trillion<\/strong> climate-focused infrastructure and decarbonization plan<\/strong> that had been cooked up before the pandemic \u2014 looks set to get even bigger now. Why? Because for decades the problem of climate change has gone mainstream in Europe<\/strong>. Outside of a few places (e.g., coal-burning Poland) and a few political stripes (e.g., populist nationalists) every major political party, left and right, has embraced climate as a core goal. As the U.S. government has waxed and waned on enthusiasm for climate policy (right now, we are in the Dark Ages), Europe has always been supportive. Now is Europe\u2019s moment<\/strong> to use that leadership to change the world.<\/p>\n

With political support at home, spending piles of money<\/strong> on deep decarbonization<\/strong> in Europe<\/strong> may prove to be the easy part. Much harder will be making sure global economies<\/strong> build back\u00a0together. A hyper-green Europe will have little impact on the climate unless the better technology and business practices nurtured at home can spread widely to the places that cause most emissions. Only 9 percent of world emissions come from Europe, a share that has dropped steadily and will decline even faster the more Europe invests in weaning its economies off of fossil fuels. Leadership is great, but\u00a0followership is what really matters for the climate<\/strong>\u00a0because it is the total emissions<\/strong> from all over the planet that accumulate in the atmosphere and cause global warming.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

As governments spend massively to revive economies, a huge battle has emerged around whether the economic recovery should also achieve other goals, particularly cutting the emissions that cause climate change. Those advocating green spending say the $10 trillion that governments have\u00a0already committed\u00a0to stimulus\u00a0should be just the beginning, and an even bigger pile of cash is […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":117652,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53,49],"tags":[76663,76659,76664,76660,42575,76668,76665,70114,76666,76658,43643,42491,52379,52259,76662,43891,76669,52569,76667,74001,4578,76661,62325,50458,42867,57125,37032,43383,66276,68659],"views":129,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117649"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=117649"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117649\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":117653,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/117649\/revisions\/117653"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/117652"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=117649"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=117649"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=117649"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}