{"id":108302,"date":"2020-02-12T15:15:25","date_gmt":"2020-02-12T12:15:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/?p=108302"},"modified":"2020-02-12T15:25:27","modified_gmt":"2020-02-12T12:25:27","slug":"yesil-enerjinin-aksine-japonya-fosil-yakit-kullanimini-artiriyor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/yesil-enerjinin-aksine-japonya-fosil-yakit-kullanimini-artiriyor\/","title":{"rendered":"Japan Goes Into Reverse on Going Green!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><\/p>\n<h1>Modern living standards \u2014 indoor lighting, affordable food, heat in the winter, an internet connection \u2014 require energy. And every energy source has its drawbacks. It\u2019s easy to point out the downsides of a given energy source and call for it to be banned. But if we\u2019re not careful about weighing costs against benefits, we\u2019re liable to end up with something even worse.<\/h1>\n<p>This is becoming painfully evident in the case of Japan. In 2011, a nuclear power plant in northeast Japan&#8217;s Fukushima prefecture was damaged by a huge tsunami and had multiple meltdowns. The radioactive contamination is still\u00a0<strong>being dealt with<\/strong>\u00a0and will be a major drain on government resources <img loading=\"lazy\" class=\"alignright wp-image-108305\" src=\"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/yesil-enerjinin-aksine-japonya-fosil-yakit-kullanimini-artiriyor.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"320\" height=\"158\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/yesil-enerjinin-aksine-japonya-fosil-yakit-kullanimini-artiriyor.jpg 718w, https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/yesil-enerjinin-aksine-japonya-fosil-yakit-kullanimini-artiriyor-300x148.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/yesil-enerjinin-aksine-japonya-fosil-yakit-kullanimini-artiriyor-500x247.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/02\/yesil-enerjinin-aksine-japonya-fosil-yakit-kullanimini-artiriyor-80x40.jpg 80w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 320px) 100vw, 320px\" \/>for decades to come. The accident also forced the\u00a0<strong>evacuation<\/strong>\u00a0of a large, densely populated area near the plant, causing a domestic refugee crisis. That catastrophe, combined with the political scandal surrounding the mismanagement of old plants, forced\u00a0<strong>the shutdown<\/strong>\u00a0of almost all nuclear power in the country.<\/p>\n<p>But total electricity consumption dipped\u00a0<strong>only slightly<\/strong>. Where did Japan make up the difference? Fossil fuels. These went from 62% of Japan\u2019s electricity production before the disaster to about 80% after:<\/p>\n<p>Even worse, it looks as if this is the new normal for Japan, at least for the next decade. A\u00a0<strong>government push<\/strong>\u00a0for green energy and rising public concerns about climate change have forced the\u00a0<strong>cancellation<\/strong>\u00a0of a few coal plants in favor of renewable sources. But the country is still on track to add more than <strong>20\u00a0coal plants<\/strong>\u00a0in the next five years. These plants\u00a0<strong>are expected<\/strong>\u00a0to emit as much carbon as all the passenger cars in the U.S.<\/p>\n<p>Part of this is problem is unique to Japan. The country has\u00a0<strong>unusually high<\/strong>\u00a0solar costs because of high land costs and limited sunshine. In most countries, the\u00a0<strong>shift to solar<\/strong>\u00a0will be faster.<\/p>\n<aside class=\"inline-newsletter\" data-state=\"ready\"><\/aside>\n<p>But Japan\u2019s experience is still a cautionary tale for other countries. Shutting off nuclear power is unlikely to lead to faster adoption of renewable energy; many countries already are (or should be) trying to shift to solar and wind to replace fossil fuels as fast as they can. Instead, the loss of nuclear will lead to either electricity shortages and reduced living standards \u2014 something that could cause popular anger and a backlash against environmental policy \u2014 or a slower decline in coal and gas use. The latter is the most likely outcome.<\/p>\n<p>The U.S. is confronting exactly this choice. As part of his Green New Deal climate plan, presidential candidate Bernie Sanders has\u00a0<strong>proposed<\/strong>\u00a0not only to ban new nuclear plants\u00a0but to close existing ones. If expansion of fossil fuel use is also banned, customers in\u00a0<strong>states<\/strong>\u00a0that use lots of nuclear will simply have to <strong>use less power<\/strong>. <span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">And not by a little, either:<\/span><\/p>\n<h2>Where the Fission Is<\/h2>\n<p>States ranked by share of electricity from nuclear power in 2018<\/p>\n<p>Lower-income residents, as usual, will be hit hardest. If the heaters and the lights start going off in Illinois, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, voters will revolt. At that point, ambitious Green New Dealers will face a choice: allow a temporary shift to easy, convenient, fossil-fuel generation and send emissions soaring again, or try to persuade citizens to suck it up for the good of the nation.<\/p>\n<p>The much easier solution is simply\u00a0<strong>not to close<\/strong>\u00a0nuclear plants in the first place. Yes, nuclear plants pose risks, but those can be managed. As long as plants aren\u2019t built in earthquake zones or along low-lying coastlines vulnerable to a tsunami, natural disasters will have a hard time taking down a U.S. nuclear power facility the way Fukushima was. A freak\u00a0<strong>tornado<\/strong>\u00a0might do it, but a direct hit by <strong>a\u00a0hurricane<\/strong>\u00a0probably poses only a minor danger because plants are generally able to shut down safely before a storm strikes. A major\u00a0<strong>terrorist attack<\/strong>\u00a0is also a threat, but officials know this and security measures are very tight. Dealing with nuclear waste is also a big and continuing\u00a0<strong>challenge<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, guarding against all of these threats and managing nuclear waste safely are expensive, meaning that without major technological\u00a0<strong>advances<\/strong>\u00a0nuclear isn&#8217;t going to get cheaper any time soon. So whether leaders manage to ban it or not, construction of new nuclear plants \u2014 the dream of many futurists and technologists \u2014 is\u00a0<strong>unlikely<\/strong>. Meanwhile, the waste problem means that in the long term a transition away from nuclear will be desirable.<\/p>\n<p>So nuclear won\u2019t be the thing that saves us from climate change; that task will fall to solar. But shuttering existing nuclear plants in the next decade would be a mistake. Despite the risks, the world isn&#8217;t ready for an abrupt transition away from nuclear. Getting rid of fossil fuels needs to be the top priority, and existing nuclear plants will remain a very important stopgap until solar really ramps up.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Modern living standards \u2014 indoor lighting, affordable food, heat in the winter, an internet connection \u2014 require energy. And every energy source has its drawbacks. It\u2019s easy to point out the downsides of a given energy source and call for it to be banned. But if we\u2019re not careful about weighing costs against benefits, we\u2019re [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":108305,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[51,53,24649,43],"tags":[66900,46719,43643,66894,66895,3804,5070,42491,66267,52259,6019,66896,66897,66891,66888,66898,4454,48814,1547,52876,34967,35121,62616,66901,66889,36443,42852,66903,66702,66904,66902,66890,53348,42363,66893,66905,66892,66899],"views":375,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108302"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=108302"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108302\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":108307,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/108302\/revisions\/108307"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/108305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=108302"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=108302"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.enerjigazetesi.ist\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=108302"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}